Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp1269453rwb; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 22:41:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5abGpbIkNNOFLZn5Co9Q0vi0/CyEL/qKZkf1nzJFzj5bJJMvC0F2YH2sGWyknnNIQiv3Vs X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:e93:b0:7ad:923a:5908 with SMTP id ho19-20020a1709070e9300b007ad923a5908mr47468700ejc.396.1667803295838; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:41:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667803295; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bAVrXNejbydQC9CRNFoYe1okarsF3IjfwPUU3G/oR+SfK3es/zXGng0bo3sRDJlIg4 ffpndevlukdhEv4+zxhIt2Wt7qcZU6CHtB2NBuZcnwHkoh7Nd1WoTFayreDSJDVqecaD EqWhv7EK6+fWEymj/TwBj+38aMxShTcJOeKvR7zt73OG9q6t8hrtkr6LB7zffCdHkTqF jFPE+O0scjpqbImapiGA1daDlVedxxinBaAT7e80c5MUTErvGOdfWHQv0gRRpVhwR4Hm 36d4xp4Eb0Xc26hK0RkOCL+B84YchiNb88Bd9eW96e0xWU3OLx6jb2GhlcdHoW+kd8qm 5uOw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=B1onyKiMF2i18Q9lQXmAHsFuLIrzUzBeZgGMhF0zPLQ=; b=z8kNfxGbEMK4bV4jUVBN9jZZBNfvNAMrVqmoKj6RWEldY7meE5OZLQtyCu6RSyLrBB k3Boj+uAqIEAPIV2kkcuHYFEY5EwVGpPqCZcV72U74MO6kJD2TN6CXaifIrYnWuontJm HsLMwYXiMsIYLqZbRCBQvNaPbz9qSb5MjmXWHTENqV76PiO9/1OEJgZRsi9w4LtZcMQj ARjV6zfb3NVg69oZmVtLtVN94Gkyp1Mx3bKmET/oR+uAf0rOf3SZNlZa7NF98fvmwZ/j fC1l/WIUJ6MCYvo1OTxer6H+C0qzR0dbtIonBBfgbzABrXIYJSU4HZLSD6Vnzattp9si lhcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=E8IFPmFp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o18-20020a170906975200b007ae4ed41508si9552761ejy.738.2022.11.06.22.41.12; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=E8IFPmFp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231259AbiKGG2c (ORCPT + 95 others); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 01:28:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43544 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230448AbiKGG23 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 01:28:29 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com (mail-pg1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011D8CFF for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 22:28:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id e129so9587279pgc.9 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:28:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=B1onyKiMF2i18Q9lQXmAHsFuLIrzUzBeZgGMhF0zPLQ=; b=E8IFPmFpXN1h/keoLYiO9TWzP3oNVBVcDT+/KJan0nvheYVwt1j1aOFsUnfpAUtOTb ltswhmtHvcYUMobfb9QUNdbDpOQqhabita7hDy1By7oIm/b2QL4MNafBh2pqJlPu6Jvs hGsYxYvWRjBQLouoaSq9LDInqpx/aVAc05Qn5G4ZZwxn0AGGTXr+z10vGxK9LPg0BgwB I8nXH3Yr6OxV9HR50AiTk4aSsdq3QnQrZ2P6T4zcXL2JlgdM1e6hQn8G2FXzvX41HAwn GdESY1RFfPb/7vH4MX32qPplv+tTOb62dPv3QEaleB2nBMzxnoSqiYeQcfcqP4qgZT+q 37gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B1onyKiMF2i18Q9lQXmAHsFuLIrzUzBeZgGMhF0zPLQ=; b=nhpM79vxWczesMNl3159lIYsUpSA4Q+6M30ND4/D7JFEuC/NkT0PLIjgABsf/XIF1a EVuya42pSI9eRr1q5zIgiRZT+J/tdEyRDk2jMTduZKoz22oXF6v6x9IL7gr4bAhCvzkc npZo/ipvvv3xGQc3mBhjHsXlII9znhATwQX67Q8VHn943RtqKeKFIbluRY/g5cxfLODA p1lj0Wqp9Tu4wfcbsdjzKvL9dHNIupxTeTzFX7ExyNWSTLdoiQdfA6x/10KRz3nJ+JdE NY9gqKFWZ1SuaU1WnfcsonKP0MfAiimLw+rANcj9vcwTQek05xkUWYZkyVyxja1Hef74 7M7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3DKLA0YT/99IgmHFvjb/JMVlDTOH9SNJXIp136IYg5eUnxaE8x xY+sVUKfmJNNB+bRsx3WLtE= X-Received: by 2002:a63:7909:0:b0:458:1ba6:ec80 with SMTP id u9-20020a637909000000b004581ba6ec80mr42103349pgc.414.1667802506380; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:28:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from sophie ([89.46.114.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m15-20020a17090a2c0f00b00210c84b8ae5sm3413070pjd.35.2022.11.06.22.28.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:28:26 -0800 (PST) From: Rebecca Mckeever To: Mike Rapoport , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Hildenbrand , Rebecca Mckeever Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 00:28:06 -0600 Message-Id: <2cc0883243d68ddc3faf833d2d9e86f48534c1d7.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a top-down allocation direction. The tested scenarios are: Range unrestricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested: + there are no previously reserved regions + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space Range restricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping min_addr: + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the first node is the requested node + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the requested node ends before min_addr + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the requested node ends before min_addr Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever --- .../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c | 344 ++++++++++++++++++ .../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h | 16 + 2 files changed, 360 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c index 6406496623a0..79150784b373 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c @@ -4,6 +4,349 @@ #define FUNC_NAME "memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw" +/* + * contains the fraction of MEM_SIZE contained in each node in basis point + * units (one hundredth of 1% or 1/10000) + */ +static const unsigned int node_fractions[] = { + 2500, /* 1/4 */ + 625, /* 1/16 */ + 1250, /* 1/8 */ + 1250, /* 1/8 */ + 625, /* 1/16 */ + 625, /* 1/16 */ + 2500, /* 1/4 */ + 625, /* 1/16 */ +}; + +/* + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that + * has enough memory to allocate a region of the requested size. + * Expect to allocate an aligned region at the end of the requested node. + */ +static int alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_simple_check(void) +{ + int nid_req = 3; + struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0]; + struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req]; + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + phys_addr_t size; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + ASSERT_LE(SZ_4, req_node->size); + size = req_node->size / SZ_4; + min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM(); + max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM(); + + allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, + nid_req); + + ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL); + ASSERT_MEM_NE(allocated_ptr, 0, size); + + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size); + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(req_node) - size); + ASSERT_LE(req_node->base, new_rgn->base); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that + * is partially reserved but has enough memory for the allocated region: + * + * | +---------------------------------------+ | + * | | requested | | + * +-----------+---------------------------------------+----------+ + * + * | +------------------+ +-----+ | + * | | reserved | | new | | + * +-----------+------------------+--------------+-----+----------+ + * + * Expect to allocate an aligned region at the end of the requested node. The + * region count and total size get updated. + */ +static int alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_part_reserved_check(void) +{ + int nid_req = 4; + struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[1]; + struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req]; + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + struct region r1; + phys_addr_t size; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + ASSERT_LE(SZ_8, req_node->size); + r1.base = req_node->base; + r1.size = req_node->size / SZ_2; + size = r1.size / SZ_4; + min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM(); + max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM(); + + memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size); + allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, + nid_req); + + ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL); + ASSERT_MEM_NE(allocated_ptr, 0, size); + + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size); + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(req_node) - size); + ASSERT_LE(req_node->base, new_rgn->base); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 2); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size + r1.size); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region that spans over the min_addr + * and max_addr range and overlaps with two different nodes, where the first + * node is the requested node: + * + * min_addr + * | max_addr + * | | + * v v + * | +-----------------------+-----------+ | + * | | requested | node3 | | + * +-----------+-----------------------+-----------+--------------+ + * + + + * | +-----------+ | + * | | rgn | | + * +-----------------------+-----------+--------------------------+ + * + * Expect to drop the lower limit and allocate a memory region that ends at + * the end of the requested node. + */ +static int alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_split_range_low_check(void) +{ + int nid_req = 2; + struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0]; + struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req]; + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + phys_addr_t size = SZ_512; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + phys_addr_t req_node_end; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + req_node_end = region_end(req_node); + min_addr = req_node_end - SZ_256; + max_addr = min_addr + size; + + allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, + nid_req); + + ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL); + ASSERT_MEM_NE(allocated_ptr, 0, size); + + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size); + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, req_node_end - size); + ASSERT_LE(req_node->base, new_rgn->base); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region that spans over the min_addr + * and max_addr range and overlaps with two different nodes, where the requested + * node ends before min_addr: + * + * min_addr + * | max_addr + * | | + * v v + * | +---------------+ +-------------+---------+ | + * | | requested | | node1 | node2 | | + * +----+---------------+--------+-------------+---------+----------+ + * + + + * | +---------+ | + * | | rgn | | + * +----------+---------+-------------------------------------------+ + * + * Expect to drop the lower limit and allocate a memory region that ends at + * the end of the requested node. + */ +static int alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_no_overlap_split_check(void) +{ + int nid_req = 2; + struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0]; + struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req]; + struct memblock_region *node2 = &memblock.memory.regions[6]; + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + phys_addr_t size; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + size = SZ_512; + min_addr = node2->base - SZ_256; + max_addr = min_addr + size; + + allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, + nid_req); + + ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL); + ASSERT_MEM_NE(allocated_ptr, 0, size); + + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size); + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(req_node) - size); + ASSERT_LE(req_node->base, new_rgn->base); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * A test that tries to allocate memory within min_addr and max_add range when + * the requested node and the range do not overlap, and requested node ends + * before min_addr. The range overlaps with multiple nodes along node + * boundaries: + * + * min_addr + * | max_addr + * | | + * v v + * |-----------+ +----------+----...----+----------+ | + * | requested | | min node | ... | max node | | + * +-----------+-----------+----------+----...----+----------+------+ + * + + + * | +-----+ | + * | | rgn | | + * +-----+-----+----------------------------------------------------+ + * + * Expect to drop the lower limit and allocate a memory region that ends at + * the end of the requested node. + */ +static int alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_no_overlap_low_check(void) +{ + int nid_req = 0; + struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0]; + struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req]; + struct memblock_region *min_node = &memblock.memory.regions[2]; + struct memblock_region *max_node = &memblock.memory.regions[5]; + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + phys_addr_t size = SZ_64; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + min_addr = min_node->base; + max_addr = region_end(max_node); + + allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, + nid_req); + + ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL); + ASSERT_MEM_NE(allocated_ptr, 0, size); + + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size); + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(req_node) - size); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + +/* Test case wrappers for NUMA tests */ +static int alloc_exact_nid_numa_simple_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + memblock_set_bottom_up(false); + alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_simple_check(); + + return 0; +} + +static int alloc_exact_nid_numa_part_reserved_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + memblock_set_bottom_up(false); + alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_part_reserved_check(); + + return 0; +} + +static int alloc_exact_nid_numa_split_range_low_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + memblock_set_bottom_up(false); + alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_split_range_low_check(); + + return 0; +} + +static int alloc_exact_nid_numa_no_overlap_split_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + memblock_set_bottom_up(false); + alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_no_overlap_split_check(); + + return 0; +} + +static int alloc_exact_nid_numa_no_overlap_low_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + memblock_set_bottom_up(false); + alloc_exact_nid_top_down_numa_no_overlap_low_check(); + + return 0; +} + +int __memblock_alloc_exact_nid_numa_checks(void) +{ + test_print("Running %s NUMA tests...\n", FUNC_NAME); + + alloc_exact_nid_numa_simple_check(); + alloc_exact_nid_numa_part_reserved_check(); + alloc_exact_nid_numa_split_range_low_check(); + alloc_exact_nid_numa_no_overlap_split_check(); + alloc_exact_nid_numa_no_overlap_low_check(); + + return 0; +} + int memblock_alloc_exact_nid_checks(void) { prefix_reset(); @@ -13,6 +356,7 @@ int memblock_alloc_exact_nid_checks(void) dummy_physical_memory_init(); memblock_alloc_exact_nid_range_checks(); + memblock_alloc_exact_nid_numa_checks(); dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h index 4408719de3b9..cef419d55d2a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h @@ -5,5 +5,21 @@ #include "common.h" int memblock_alloc_exact_nid_checks(void); +int __memblock_alloc_exact_nid_numa_checks(void); + +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA +static inline int memblock_alloc_exact_nid_numa_checks(void) +{ + __memblock_alloc_exact_nid_numa_checks(); + return 0; +} + +#else +static inline int memblock_alloc_exact_nid_numa_checks(void) +{ + return 0; +} + +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ #endif -- 2.34.1