Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933289AbXHFVnx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:43:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753055AbXHFVnq (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:43:46 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:55769 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751664AbXHFVnp (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:43:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22.y] ieee1394: revert "sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping" From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Olaf Hering Cc: Stefan Richter , Robert Hancock , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070806115804.GA1734@suse.de> References: <46B4B3DC.7020609@shaw.ca> <46B4B7C6.1040107@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <1186272926.938.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46B5824B.1000103@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20070806115804.GA1734@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:43:17 +1000 Message-Id: <1186436597.938.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1406 Lines: 34 On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:58 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, Stefan Richter wrote: > > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > >>> If setting 32-bit DMA mask fails on ppc64, that sounds like a problem > > >>> with the DMA implementation on that architecture. There are enough cards > > >>> out there that only support 32-bit DMA that this really needs to work.. > > >> Yes, could the PPC folks please have a look at it? Thanks. > > > > > > Smells like we may have a bug there. No worries though, all current PPC > > > machines have an iommu that will not give out addresses above 32 bits > > > anyway, but I'll double check what's up. > > > > > > Do you see something in dmesg when that happens ? > > > > There was nothing in Olaf's report, except for trouble in sbp2 _after_ > > the failure. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/1/344 (I don't have a PMac.) > > sbp2util_remove_command_orb_pool() does not check for lu->hi being NULL. > > dev->dma_mask is NULL too, thats why dma_direct_dma_supported() returns > false, and dma_set_mask() will return -EIO. Strange... PCI devices should never have a NULL dma mask. I wonder how we get there... Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/