Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <524f23fa-b069-1468-dfc6-fa342c11cb7f@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:26:12 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Stop adding speculative Intel GP
 PMCs that don't exist yet
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220919091008.60695-1-likexu@tencent.com>
 <Y0CAHch5UR2Lp0tU@google.com>
 <a90c28df-eb54-f20a-13a5-9ee4172f870e@gmail.com>
 <Y0mL3g2Eamp4bMHD@google.com>
From:   Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y0mL3g2Eamp4bMHD@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 15/10/2022 12:18 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
>> On 8/10/2022 3:38 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Does this need Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org?  Or is this benign enough that we don't
>>> care?
>>
>> Considering stable kernel may access IA32_OVERCLOCKING_STATUS as well,
>> cc stable list helps to remove the illusion of pmu msr scope for stable tree
>> maintainers.
> 
> Is that a "yes, this should be Cc'd stable" or "no, don't bother"?

Oops, I missed this one. "Yes, this should be Cc'd" as I have received a few 
complaints on this.

Please let me know if I need to post a new version of this minor patch set, 
considering the previous
comment "No need for a v4, the above nits can be handled when applying. "

Thanks,
Like Xu