Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S282042AbRLFScL>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:32:11 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282481AbRLFSby>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:31:54 -0500
Received: from h152-148-10-6.outland.lucent.com ([152.148.10.6]:46001 "EHLO
	alpo.casc.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S282042AbRLFSbp>;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:31:45 -0500
From: John Stoffel <stoffel@casc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15375.47450.229337.322610@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:30:50 -0500
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: stoffel@casc.com (John Stoffel), riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel),
        landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley), esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond),
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5
In-Reply-To: <E16C2HM-0002JR-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <15375.41990.439405.8024@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<E16C2HM-0002JR-00@the-village.bc.nu>
X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under Emacs 20.6.1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

>> So has anyone had time to test the Python version 1.5 based CML2 that
>> was posted?  Would that make it more acceptable?

Alan> For 2.5 its a great leap forward. 

That was my thought when I saw the patch to make CML2 work with Python
1.5 in Kernel 2.5. 

John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/