Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp1822146rwb; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 06:15:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5qPdnTlPlKxnjNWZdEiQEs3+9jnzf+Q1LMu+H3tWzlFZOUCh1SaSCHLaSVA8HdNiy7YoFF X-Received: by 2002:a63:2bd4:0:b0:451:5df1:4b15 with SMTP id r203-20020a632bd4000000b004515df14b15mr43843872pgr.518.1667830521089; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 06:15:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667830521; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OZiifLmxMV1Zi7ZGkYmTf83bNfa2QPxZi7Hf1STS1dAzcQ/O+5gNNFrh4Vfgbe0rk1 Zwzb+1E/sTxFOBFsYBqNSjp5rhFcykYzZa3gQDdkyVGzoJDR3c5ClUYziZwfrPIMaahn lOxg2pPCAYMAwchbeUghWDsni7YE0l4uTssX3XMVTyuBWfOlwVHiOr+umO846jXp/zSa adgVlkLknkkoP8U5d/13PkjN+FYhU4rMyATHkYfcxQHJmT0z3na4osuFrMFneVoCbAy+ jcluwNQ2FGN3J0NiAiWkPGE6fldhchKWWf9xo3ajnvm09+EFm73Hjxscw2qVyZ9nIstM o7Hg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; bh=dqu5zIOESPm3gva/MW+lDZfupT/XYQf13VtkcooGjRs=; b=i7q6KZBXEMbyS+HhJANhdKgv5CnK+pEgqc4liEtlqhfJE/QQeFycJMLLdvnAEVYSWG Nu7nA2/P5qCc3d+ByMpahzbn7V0vTXk656mD2mpwUZBBi8Hp8O+Vdu30lRy7LGEVzFLh LUW3NmIXWvXLrWW9KqVHcwExoT5ROcpoM0gqZOho3nTLip88ZsnXKsPwUTMuP116dPnI HrnB4QzFZYLjyfsZ4PGapRJUVJRxlgxWhLEdgm8RcelasBLT2b20j7/gYy50sg6V9UqZ PnOcfwKwp3oN5Sh31PSwtbzHcC3lEQuWNBnVK8p6DjAG7gWWioPFasjC33OyfqvxAFht Wr1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nu6-20020a17090b1b0600b00212e4f02881si12251071pjb.177.2022.11.07.06.15.08; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 06:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231349AbiKGNrS (ORCPT + 94 others); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 08:47:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42010 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229778AbiKGNrQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 08:47:16 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5741CFCE for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 05:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4N5XW94lG2zpWDX; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 21:43:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.230] (10.174.176.230) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 21:47:11 +0800 Message-ID: <7576839f-9a1d-65ee-afa8-2ba8eed44ffd@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 21:47:10 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: kprobe: Fix potential null-ptr-deref on trace_array in kprobe_event_gen_test_exit() To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" CC: , , References: <20221107071617.21644-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com> <20221107071617.21644-3-shangxiaojing@huawei.com> <20221107223835.4d5583852a7efef1a2ac19af@kernel.org> From: shangxiaojing In-Reply-To: <20221107223835.4d5583852a7efef1a2ac19af@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.230] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 2022/11/7 21:38, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:16:17 +0800 > Shang XiaoJing wrote: > >> When test_gen_kprobe_cmd() failed after kprobe_event_gen_cmd_end(), it >> will goto delete, which will call kprobe_event_delete() and release the >> corresponding resource. However, the trace_array in gen_kretprobe_test >> will point to the invalid resource. Set gen_kretprobe_test->tr to NULL >> after called kprobe_event_delete() and add NULL check when releasing >> the module. >> >> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000070 >> PGD 0 P4D 0 >> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI >> CPU: 0 PID: 246 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W >> 6.1.0-rc1-00174-g9522dc5c87da-dirty #248 >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS >> rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 >> RIP: 0010:__ftrace_set_clr_event_nolock+0x53/0x1b0 >> Code: e8 82 26 fc ff 49 8b 1e c7 44 24 0c ea ff ff ff 49 39 de 0f 84 3c >> 01 00 00 c7 44 24 18 00 00 00 00 e8 61 26 fc ff 48 8b 6b 10 <44> 8b 65 >> 70 4c 8b 6d 18 41 f7 c4 00 02 00 00 75 2f >> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000159fe00 EFLAGS: 00010293 >> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88810971d268 RCX: 0000000000000000 >> RDX: ffff8881080be600 RSI: ffffffff811b48ff RDI: ffff88810971d058 >> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 >> R10: ffffc9000159fe58 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffa0001064 >> R13: ffffffffa000106c R14: ffff88810971d238 R15: 0000000000000000 >> FS: 00007f89eeff6540(0000) GS:ffff88813b600000(0000) >> knlGS:0000000000000000 >> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> CR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000010599e004 CR4: 0000000000330ef0 >> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 >> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 >> Call Trace: >> >> __ftrace_set_clr_event+0x3e/0x60 >> trace_array_set_clr_event+0x35/0x50 >> ? 0xffffffffa0000000 >> kprobe_event_gen_test_exit+0xcd/0x10b [kprobe_event_gen_test] >> __x64_sys_delete_module+0x206/0x380 >> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd8/0x190 >> ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1c/0x50 >> do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd >> RIP: 0033:0x7f89eeb061b7 >> >> Fixes: 64836248dda2 ("tracing: Add kprobe event command generation test module") >> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing >> --- >> kernel/trace/kprobe_event_gen_test.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/kprobe_event_gen_test.c b/kernel/trace/kprobe_event_gen_test.c >> index 1c98fafcf333..277e21e4a63e 100644 >> --- a/kernel/trace/kprobe_event_gen_test.c >> +++ b/kernel/trace/kprobe_event_gen_test.c >> @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ static int __init test_gen_kprobe_cmd(void) >> delete: >> /* We got an error after creating the event, delete it */ >> ret = kprobe_event_delete("gen_kprobe_test"); >> + if (trace_event_file_is_valid(gen_kprobe_test)) >> + gen_kprobe_test->tr = NULL; > > I think the correct fix should be > > if (trace_event_file_is_valid(gen_kprobe_test)) { > trace_put_event_file(gen_kprobe_test); > gen_kprobe_test = NULL; > } > ret = kprobe_event_delete("gen_kprobe_test"); > > Since the gen_kprobe_event is owned by ftrace subsystem, the test > code should not change the tr field. > When trace_array_set_clr_event() failed, it already called trace_put_event_file(), maybe we only need set gen_kprobe_test to NULL. >> goto out; >> } >> >> @@ -208,6 +210,8 @@ static int __init test_gen_kretprobe_cmd(void) >> delete: >> /* We got an error after creating the event, delete it */ >> ret = kprobe_event_delete("gen_kretprobe_test"); >> + if (trace_event_file_is_valid(gen_kretprobe_test)) >> + gen_kretprobe_test->tr = NULL; > > Ditto. > > And then, below changes are not required. Yes, will fix in v2, thanks for the review. Thanks, -- Shang XiaoJing