Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:01:27 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>,
        Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Write CONTROL_TCS with next
 timer wakeup
Message-ID: <20221107170127.i5bfkx45egaf2oh4@builder.lan>
References: <20221018152837.619426-7-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
 <202210190144.WIiituiJ-lkp@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202210190144.WIiituiJ-lkp@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:47:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
[..]
>    155	#define USECS_TO_CYCLES(time_usecs)			\
>    156		xloops_to_cycles((time_usecs) * 0x10C7UL)
>    157	
>    158	static inline unsigned long xloops_to_cycles(unsigned long xloops)

Any objections to me changing the type to u64 while applying the
patches?

Regards,
Bjorn

>    159	{
>  > 160		return (xloops * loops_per_jiffy * HZ) >> 32;
>    161	}
>    162