Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <bb7ae6ed-0666-023c-c956-e5f5956c34ed@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:04:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Stop adding speculative Intel GP
 PMCs that don't exist yet
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220919091008.60695-1-likexu@tencent.com>
 <Y0CAHch5UR2Lp0tU@google.com>
 <a90c28df-eb54-f20a-13a5-9ee4172f870e@gmail.com>
 <Y0mL3g2Eamp4bMHD@google.com>
 <524f23fa-b069-1468-dfc6-fa342c11cb7f@gmail.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <524f23fa-b069-1468-dfc6-fa342c11cb7f@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/7/22 08:26, Like Xu wrote:
> On 15/10/2022 12:18 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2022 3:38 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>> Does this need Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org?  Or is this benign enough 
>>>> that we don't
>>>> care?
>>>
>>> Considering stable kernel may access IA32_OVERCLOCKING_STATUS as well,
>>> cc stable list helps to remove the illusion of pmu msr scope for 
>>> stable tree
>>> maintainers.
>>
>> Is that a "yes, this should be Cc'd stable" or "no, don't bother"?
> 
> Oops, I missed this one. "Yes, this should be Cc'd" as I have received a 
> few complaints on this.
> 
> Please let me know if I need to post a new version of this minor patch 
> set, considering the previous
> comment "No need for a v4, the above nits can be handled when applying. "

Queued, thanks.

Paolo