Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 22:22:23 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] of: property: Add device link support
 for PCS
Message-ID: <20221107202223.ihdk4ubbqpro5w5y@skbuf>
References: <20221103210650.2325784-1-sean.anderson@seco.com>
 <20221103210650.2325784-9-sean.anderson@seco.com>
 <20221107201010.GA1525628-robh@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221107201010.GA1525628-robh@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 02:10:10PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > This adds device link support for PCS devices. Both the recommended
> > pcs-handle and the deprecated pcsphy-handle properties are supported.
> > This should provide better probe ordering.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > (no changes since v1)
> > 
> >  drivers/of/property.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> Seems like no dependency on the rest of the series, so I can take this 
> patch?

Is fw_devlink well-behaved these days, so as to not break (forever defer)
the probing of the device having the pcs-handle, if no driver probed on
the referenced PCS? Because the latter is what will happen if no one
picks up Sean's patches to probe PCS devices in the usual device model
way, I think.