Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221106210225.2065371-1-ogabbay@kernel.org> <20221106210225.2065371-2-ogabbay@kernel.org>
 <5fe8e8c0-d28b-3666-e437-10fa0c591ed8@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <5fe8e8c0-d28b-3666-e437-10fa0c591ed8@quicinc.com>
From:   Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:05:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFCwf10iNhi7=O_c==0dzyiMVSL05R8bJQ1HPJJo04bwz86e=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] drivers/accel: define kconfig and register a
 new major
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>,
        Jiho Chu <jiho.chu@samsung.com>,
        Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
        Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>,
        Maciej Kwapulinski <maciej.kwapulinski@linux.intel.com>,
        Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 6:12 PM Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/6/2022 2:02 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > +int __init accel_core_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     ret = accel_sysfs_init();
> > +     if (ret < 0) {
> > +             DRM_ERROR("Cannot create ACCEL class: %d\n", ret);
> > +             goto error;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     accel_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("accel", NULL);
> > +
> > +     ret = register_chrdev(ACCEL_MAJOR, "accel", &accel_stub_fops);
> > +     if (ret < 0)
> > +             goto error;
>
> We are not jumping over anything here.  Seems like this whole if block
> could just be removed.
correct, will be fixed.
>
> > +
> > +error:
> > +     /* Any cleanup will be done in drm_core_exit() that will call
> > +      * to accel_core_exit()
> > +      */
>
> This doesn't look like the standard multi-line comment style.  Are we
> going to say that the accel subsystem follows net and differs from the
> kernel standard?
I'll change it to the kernel standard.
Thx,
Oded
>
> > +     return ret;
> > +}