Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221106210225.2065371-1-ogabbay@kernel.org> <20221106210225.2065371-4-ogabbay@kernel.org>
 <2537e41d-f863-4819-57d2-09b9554f801b@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <2537e41d-f863-4819-57d2-09b9554f801b@quicinc.com>
From:   Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:04:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFCwf12h2FH_CrPKszWfFVRCfnQeavYY+sXmjk9jChbT-+WBcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] drm: initialize accel framework
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>,
        Jiho Chu <jiho.chu@samsung.com>,
        Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
        Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>,
        Maciej Kwapulinski <maciej.kwapulinski@linux.intel.com>,
        Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 6:25 PM Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/6/2022 2:02 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> > @@ -603,6 +626,14 @@ static int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> >       /* no per-device feature limits by default */
> >       dev->driver_features = ~0u;
> >
> > +     if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_COMPUTE_ACCEL) &&
> > +                             (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_RENDER) ||
> > +                             drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))) {
>
> Shouldn't the indentation for the 2nd and 3rd line be such that the
> start of the lines is aligned with the "(" on the first line?
afaik there is no such rule. If there was, checkpatch should have reported that.
Oded