Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <c5af2329-7cc5-9909-b630-70fb102229fd@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:20:17 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Introduce pdc bindings for
 QDU1000 and QRU1000
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
CC:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20221026190441.4002212-1-quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
 <20221026190441.4002212-6-quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
 <20221027182240.E9FA0C433D6@smtp.kernel.org>
 <eeb3e06d-316a-1ff8-b4b8-c257fa03a206@quicinc.com>
 <20221107171622.nh62m4bf635rl2ae@builder.lan>
From:   Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221107171622.nh62m4bf635rl2ae@builder.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 11/7/2022 9:16 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 02:31:08PM -0700, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>
>> On 10/27/2022 11:22 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Melody Olvera (2022-10-26 12:04:41)
>>>> Add compatible fields for QDU1000 and QRU1000 pdcs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>> Is there a reason why this patch continues to be included in what is
>>> otherwise a clk driver patch series? Can this patch be sent separately
>>> from the clk patches (and not Cced to clk maintainers/list) in the
>>> future?
>> Sure thing. On reflection, this belongs with the misc support patches.
>>
> Even better, the "misc" series goes through my tree but this patch is
> unrelated. So if you send it on it's own it could just be picked up by
> the PDC maintainer (or Rob).
>
>
Sure thing. I'll just send each on their own.

Thanks,
Melody