Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761512AbXHGJwa (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 05:52:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757647AbXHGJwS (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 05:52:18 -0400 Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:47975 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756677AbXHGJwR (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 05:52:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:52:46 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Marcin =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A6lusarz?= Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Jean-Baptiste Vignaud , linux-kernel , shemminger , linux-net , netdev , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox Subject: Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time Message-ID: <20070807095246.GB3223@ff.dom.local> References: <20070726083120.GA26910@elte.hu> <20070726085523.GA3423@ff.dom.local> <20070726091254.GA8063@elte.hu> <4bacf17f0707300029g5116e70bq4808059dc8b069f1@mail.gmail.com> <20070731132037.GC1046@ff.dom.local> <4bacf17f0708060000n5a00bb77i74adc3b4b28ac42b@mail.gmail.com> <20070806070300.GA4509@elte.hu> <4bacf17f0708070046o14403089v8376a4544f72fec3@mail.gmail.com> <20070807082321.GB2120@ff.dom.local> <4bacf17f0708070237w19d184b3p7f74b53612edb9a6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4bacf17f0708070237w19d184b3p7f74b53612edb9a6@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1216 Lines: 28 On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Marcin ?lusarz wrote: > 2007/8/7, Jarek Poplawski : > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:46:36AM +0200, Marcin ?lusarz wrote: > > > Network card still locks up (tested on 2.6.22.1). I had to upload more > > > data than usual (~350 MB vs ~1-100 MB) to trigger that bug but it > > > might be a coincidence... > > > > Thanks! It's a good news after all - it would be really strange why > > this place doesn't hit more people (it seems there is some safety > > elsewhere for this). > > > > BTW: I hope, this previous Thomas' patch with Ingo's warning to resend.c > > (with a warning), had no problems with a similar load? > I always tested on 500-600 MB "dataset" > > > PS: Marcin, if you need a break in this testing let us know! > No, i don't need a break. I'll have more time in next weeks. Great! So, I'll try to send a patch with _SW_RESEND in a few hours, if Ingo doesn't prepare something for you. Thanks, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/