Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp2885814rwb; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 20:15:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4t/Xqd2zSsSp4MaCSo8aqU+zKG3GpBzBxpbxtF7QpZEWcs0UUwC3KTjHHEwfRNWHir2mtO X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:984:b0:7ae:50c3:396d with SMTP id bf4-20020a170907098400b007ae50c3396dmr13274892ejc.360.1667880929374; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 20:15:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667880929; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bjWdGWG77gozhWQQpp7l+9xWhtG1D92JqBPRVvF7Fo9k+9rYo6EkqeTeKiDE+YnhH2 WZtN7OAQWanwEMzpgh8/9EjE8poRscmY/4vYgupE3Nx6To2HIRwc1uLAhzJyuebsyXp1 BmDueUhkY9Ye0AOnJ+6BwTASoMxo/E12eZUbRaKdhTOyaBl+xCWb4982wcv7MjlkyHRP 73P/NhtxBB+nc0JfEZ4Pcsebw0BNb4HCZB2fvYxFJKCc5MQAfoP3uAbAUKSXCJSsIgFN G3HY2AHvvKofLE9j1eqq76rYPtJTZIXKoIDqPQAjs1IJC9qeUgcLzIY0SQnDsUjaANkF LhIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=0lAmA2xZiuustTD5Iab19OKJCMRHWwA7na99usxYrVE=; b=hRCBvrDbiByH4FLB5QU6iRLBKfAkjPLZDWE186u/fSKc15HFjwgTyeS7Knqa0b32VY 9Ur0ORNpvhWqYLvWqIy+hs5GEcj4NCTUz4c3foGu7zQL7HRPpMuvoU7I1j95Q4R/7ZFd /rnDwg9l2f82Xr0k0S4rQK4OZtMjoilzIoKPbsgO90MRW3AvjfTvPtc4AfCl4UtG9eGm A2vA+I9J7pSH8lujDX9QzndrQI2Ndx3LpUI2Orih7JWsBaQyq2RRXf9phcnA7tH5/nz+ FtUjLDkGsukDgdbx7+tYnw6qi+votX8GDhVVF2Xlqec4gdHeIqo2MwfWxWcSMKNucGMJ Vnuw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=JWm2j9VQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b11-20020a056402350b00b0045d53f8ea52si1511396edd.1.2022.11.07.20.15.08; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 20:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=JWm2j9VQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232953AbiKHD4a (ORCPT + 90 others); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 22:56:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230046AbiKHD42 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 22:56:28 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com (smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com [185.125.188.120]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC131264A1; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:56:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.35] (42-72-159-215.emome-ip.hinet.net [42.72.159.215]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75C36422BF; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 03:56:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1667879785; bh=0lAmA2xZiuustTD5Iab19OKJCMRHWwA7na99usxYrVE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JWm2j9VQOM6i+yoby3P9rQcPwjGqokH3TQTGxhy+Or6yXtxlYu6LHRRiIN0cSVu8j N6PquUbxeazlilTKSx3DWvjuhjufR7xqCFHu8Wa/ODifE8V6H0eEj8Xv9vrRfBrK5T uurHs/btVuXXdGDtGrXCoB0G0X7J8TnC015VnK0tNqPVpIkf1KoFB1aazHVe33FIEd SucMLJOdeyHRWfkuPbnwnN+vWrtQgrCmR9K58bLCGJdgiR90zzDzV3hSeAvUx9nfU9 /a48AtAbmqVCNwsQY4tp86JWFMdm+eQMnAgl4NGEpdKkVXCkLLQvc0BELGp+Lzjels gHuSrB2AIRFjA== Message-ID: <0b298830-47cc-bb94-0e73-493e4e9244f7@canonical.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:56:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Add camera access keys, IdeaPad driver improvements Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Eray_Or=c3=a7unus?= , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, mgross@linux.intel.com, pobrn@protonmail.com References: <20221029120311.11152-1-erayorcunus@gmail.com> From: Ike Panhc In-Reply-To: <20221029120311.11152-1-erayorcunus@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/29/22 20:03, Eray Orçunus wrote: > Nowadays many laptops have camera access keys, yet there is no usage codes > mapped to them, even though it's introduced in HUTRR72. Start point of > this patch series was adding it and making IdeaPads send it to userspace. > But later I discovered that camera_power attribute of ideapad-laptop > driver on my IdeaPad 520-15IKB doesn't work, so I can't toggle it with > that. I managed to find a way to check whether an IdeaPad supports > camera_power attribute (which sends VPCCMD_W_CAMERA to EC), don't expose > it to sysfs so userspace will know that it can't toggle camera access via > camera_power, in my case, after receiving KEY_CAMERA_ACCESS_TOGGLE. > > Along the way I discovered that old IdeaPads, like S10-3, may not be able > to toggle their touchpad as a regression of a commit aimed for newer > IdeaPads, so I reverted it. > > Also I noticed that I can get/set the state of my keyboard light, > so one of the patches also adds supports for this kind of keyboard lights, > which I call "partially supported keyboard lights". I expect that commit > to add keyboard light support for 520-15IKB, 330-17ICH, 5 (15) and more. > Currently only tested on 520-15IKB. Thanks. Also test on my ideapad s410 and it looks good. Acked-by: Ike Panhc