Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 07:56:18 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@intel.com>,
        Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@eideticom.com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Userspace P2PDMA with O_DIRECT NVMe devices
Message-ID: <20221108065618.GA20283@lst.de>
References: <20221021174116.7200-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20221024150320.GA26731@lst.de> <743ad0e5-6936-9287-d093-2ce1c2a3e32d@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <743ad0e5-6936-9287-d093-2ce1c2a3e32d@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:15:56PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> A little earlier, Jens graciously offered [1] to provide a topic branch,
> such as:
>
>     for-6.2/block-gup [2]
>
> (I've moved the name forward from 6.1 to 6.2, because that discussion
> was 7 weeks ago.)

So what are we going to do with this series?  It would be sad to miss
the merge window again.