Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:10:21 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Cc:     Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patches for staging:media drivers
Message-ID: <Y2oO7fU4whKr+3hb@kadam>
References: <Y2eSCZJNWn6DzCUu@qemulion>
 <48f4bda9-b5e3-9649-aab9-b529889bf110@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48f4bda9-b5e3-9649-aab9-b529889bf110@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 06:29:30PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 06/11/2022 11:52, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > Greetings to all.
> > My name is Deepak R Varma and I was part of the recent Outreachy internship
> > round. I learned during this program that patches for the media drivers were
> > prohibited to be included in the Outreachy effort due to lack of bandwidth for
> > the maintainers to respond on those.
> > 
> > The Outreachy round is now over but I am continuing to work on code improvement
> > and changes. I would like to know if it is okay for me to now identify
> > opportunities in the media drivers and send patch proposal for your kind
> > consideration. I intend to send couple of Coccinelle identified code
> > improvements as patches.
> > 
> > Please let me know.
> 
> I won't say no but since the media maintainers will need to apply them,
> the problem is the same.

Yeah.  Me either.  Those rules are for Outreachy so they don't apply to
anyone else, but at the same time no one is going to Ack your patches
without seeing them and especially for a subsystem they don't maintain.

I always try to think about if maintainers will want my patches.  Like
I sometimes see people returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM but, you know,
unless it reaches user space it's not technically a bug.  You can't go
around fixing everyone's bad taste.  But everyone likes bug fixes.

regards,
dan carpenter