Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp3418007rwb; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 04:28:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5jOu2YldoURAAiDKvPxTRDdG8JuEJavojLhpKuUq0U2L1jcO5uQFj1RKAjS2rX+N/6RcZw X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1911:b0:461:f0d8:4eb6 with SMTP id e17-20020a056402191100b00461f0d84eb6mr56187383edz.297.1667910508579; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 04:28:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667910508; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NF6GxKySv9KUOu4QkRup00a+Ab3pLB+yoEt9KHW1N7gE3ZpgRJvPLPCd42uafiF+Yt b+5RmkPmbua9eC1oioykkjPqTa2Vd46+W/ZUF5eAgOH+sswARCs/iWy3Aj7fzwQ3Heuc f3tJAgANoE2dyGaCsjZYoxa4qNRAzBSVx992ZM5y6mapRXB350JPDfag7q6vEVc6qYQm 53WI2hYIbL4XUWbh211uc982yMBzCH7B9nIkrRuFLVwJAuVHgjykXTjn8bOF6TcZAOym 8kG+xexVoATPDOquSUHdwM9Jmeu7xPz7IG6gmGNpnfNz5VECjHaPnislzefy2h5cgG1l H4Jw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=qM4ECMWHeIXvPjmyNOTQuoAG1zspGoC64oBLo2Q0bKQ=; b=rnlBuqeSkzPpG4v07zeiojcS1zuocPGJxaGjaaj1BrWRLimV7vQrhFptw2573BEh8w z3WIRyhxg8yuFxeVleQkWnvSBmpQ9C1pC15KximJK1/35XG5wltmpH/UGaccZ3CKoDsN 4UmyNfMf4412UM+YQd8fYWA2L19de7Yjqk59aRmKzFgNAhhhveE87fcxEQP4CjZgMlcg lR6yFUEbZyXyLbPf+CMZerdTuuj2yQFNWrtlsqGIFBvP/bpxziZBAD/olMcCAsJREIBc za2KKA0kbsrzi2GROl+wJdxFQhQPTutwi2xEXgKu8o3jDGzqKDURdJYMMgt0wzeRBRXc MLjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=KYyqVfSm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hw19-20020a170907a0d300b007adb868f102si9517012ejc.476.2022.11.08.04.28.07; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 04:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=KYyqVfSm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234128AbiKHLZq (ORCPT + 89 others); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:25:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35200 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234109AbiKHLZG (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:25:06 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 509174FF9A; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 03:25:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87B9614F6; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30A9EC433D6; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:25:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667906705; bh=Jlcv4F7K6dxP/Icf73x6ONzyur9GFR/J4bBQqn3lSGI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KYyqVfSmSq6CRBF0I0oBl/HeUwJx6zE4DpRuJqRHkqKccNQm+lZU3ecqXXJgkTqNw IH2zkk0Ie+5wN+u/uRwnaCobHyZiRw7jkIhs+/nZgnk8PR53LOvUxxFGFR5OhP8Gx2 ukRnUPeDCCtwyTmLB5IkzLO0XpwqS/mGwWi/Wy174JfwTzGpFj9+yh9XKa88S9HMdx CLxkV9/WMdyEEY33VMO7vNYSnqvXXvtt15ZD7Td4FBHLEtUGVi/jaxjCKA84W+ZGot 0BzNlyccOdBUEVUIZxXG04P7rgY7IWg4gyk1qMRCNrB4G36EUKTmhLLR0zh/3cm62o l/L7vrd8imLkA== Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:25:00 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Florian Weimer , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand failed - Bail out! Failed to clear signal handler for child process Message-ID: <20221108112500.rffm2hmt2kvdc3io@wittgenstein> References: <20221108100420.6zhmrio226vbii4e@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:51:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 15:34, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:28:55PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand failed on arm32 and i386 > > > but passed on arm64 and x86_64. > > > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > > > > > # selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand > > > # TAP version 13 > > > # 1..1 > > > # # clone3() syscall supported > > > # Bail out! Failed to clear signal handler for child process > > > # # Planned tests != run tests (1 != 0) > > > # # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > > not ok 2 selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand # exit=1 > > > > > > Test details links, > > > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/5820146#L1795 > > > > > > Test results comparison link, > > > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20221107/testrun/12848543/suite/kselftest-clone3/test/clone3.clone3_clear_sighand/history/ > > > > Seems before 27 September 2022 this test wasn't run on 32bit instances > > and noone ever noticed? > > This email is about sharing the results log and reporting failures. > If you think it is not supported on 32bit the test should SKIP instead of fail. No, I was just asking whether this has been detected just now for the first time. If this has been a problem for such a long time I was just puzzled why this was never reported.