Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:01:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:01:29 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:53437 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:59:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:59:01 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Horst von Brand Cc: John Stoffel , "Eric S. Raymond" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Message-ID: <20011206195901.B360@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <200112061851.fB6IpHE0016176@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200112061851.fB6IpHE0016176@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl>; from vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:51:17PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:51:17PM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > John Stoffel said: > > >>>>> "Alan" == Alan Cox writes: > > > > >> So has anyone had time to test the Python version 1.5 based CML2 that > > >> was posted? Would that make it more acceptable? > > > > Alan> For 2.5 its a great leap forward. > > > > That was my thought when I saw the patch to make CML2 work with Python > > 1.5 in Kernel 2.5. > > I just shudder when thinking that I'll have to learn yet another weird > language to be able to hack on Linux... C, gcc-isms with asm() and all, a > bit of CML1, now CML2, are OK; and now Python... And as of now, how many contributions have you made to the current configurators? You know, you'll only have to know Python if you intend to help ESR with the configurator itself... /David _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/