Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp3603512rwb; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:28:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4o7DvAaFgBIzaO/dYNcITkVFCPlffxgwtIddui7MjlfAFTeiKTE5CNKtywR/i4KdLw0EP7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c04:b0:7ad:8318:99aa with SMTP id nc4-20020a1709071c0400b007ad831899aamr51914285ejc.574.1667917711113; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 06:28:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667917711; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kJmBqhl1L6hOXIPzTJHY4TsvcBMeeBVrxuW3dbqIlH/adhjZ9gjeJsQpZiM0xfjYn2 e/Siw2VEpFXjZ7nK5sNE5szJH6DtJJ2Nxm7zQ0tssU/yvNY8Gwb7QNLMiSRRdRsq85LZ Ma35K7Iw7+sqMz1uwzJrYqyX8fX5qRKjOiLGcuckpIWeo0V5yLOgARaODM4yFLcT7y8S bJgiM2tvB4KT5op/laISQAfY3tfQ5Aohj4nSzSpehM2vFRcvtjY/gr5EXdnYcBOPMeu5 xykfTo8noONHxYnG2QNgTQiXTPp0xWiSu81ClbXS/+CE66mcd4b1M/jAfUG/e253g8Es PvXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=A7/QEu2TvHXhOSYbtw3o8zbJW2eMLja/d3Fk5yvRrPo=; b=yVo6h7CU4+n4c0KQJMm1OfPNIhzo4VXrxgfku4K8AVMLFEZmR2qDTQGCBZonHQ0FS+ iu8Y92AnifLuWmDiY9m/euW+9GPEPX1Q7/I0DUyT81f4dIdyFn2LoYEZSqcqm5j6j+FD 0EzNrtXJU4/esQyJbS2YJs0mdS1EMb4M0cUTtJqPRxPtvitONFXbp7z0rGP9tS4ReoJc k3NMoRCw8x4h4rr1WizAiVykjIBFvELDg8UOmBk+nDJGFH7+yRoHsl6sy0NjtOVe1CUr UNarAPtCGTFwUwFJZhl0ME+AghQ7BJpPaYfABbxnLzBfKoeoXs2ptCub8vGlOPzV2cTo /uZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=f1JCxMsx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ho42-20020a1709070eaa00b007add5af39f6si13772509ejc.929.2022.11.08.06.28.08; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 06:28:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=f1JCxMsx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234672AbiKHNvg (ORCPT + 90 others); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 08:51:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51448 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234669AbiKHNvY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 08:51:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06AA162385 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 05:51:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id b2so38754901eja.6 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 05:51:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=A7/QEu2TvHXhOSYbtw3o8zbJW2eMLja/d3Fk5yvRrPo=; b=f1JCxMsx0M8HqwDkU6lPwPysCMC5ZPsDr6Jp/wS5hGVNoGqE1t/5/jeioXRGCABh3x ql48ZwD2xI3RMDLry2HobRimhA42BGuupXzKcdCO5jgTGOlZZ/7ayqBMZ/HjKupSQSBR mmdmuISZbdqN8sy9IOyMbtulIFa7pm79Ipwr+vmfIxyCsga2AjvIIqK5eEpA1wsC3Etw FQy8UB+7AwA9LiCC9vnMj7hjE8m9rpw9U/BAg79Xe3Ote8+Z2M7Wr+caV4fAAGwChEpg A8XyRK55MyQk06bdE9xrNCdweuokE6wuaq7XgHJro4juHaptTbn8yzhujMZPVFBiYr5C 3rmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=A7/QEu2TvHXhOSYbtw3o8zbJW2eMLja/d3Fk5yvRrPo=; b=Zv7IchRObG3BhgtelI+hhaq99Dkh5Q3FFba1uGodPhq6kU8rGdkbF3dC0JldhGFazy nh5qnIJINFYrDVYu9SIVygWQXl76ok+K+FdVdDaWZZsNAj3SkCwmPBWGycxzu8htCoIG yDqVTVyPEDGSuihyeeJDi4xW49WfDZ5vlL9Z4nAaKomROyAKx/ZyXrWSRaq74lGf6uPP G5mU+wsy2Uboh2gQSvXE9Jk1TD3QocSj8nmAsB0I4QHJpK5N7Sf4a1x8qVlOMnPLEkQZ ECCYyPvpa9qQpw+Qjy4k/KtVnPymKCvLybgqQKQZ/jtgTc9JtsHMHasKFsfFnt/0RPWf XYvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1JTthHHHNKBLNkiqPBr5q3t3nEMBHi+4YwV4PR54FsE5ub7QIt xhI9Tg7eiWmysvLDXa8HBqCn374vpGXOn+3MoR4y7ZNRN9s= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4c4b:b0:7ad:a197:b58e with SMTP id d11-20020a1709064c4b00b007ada197b58emr54144312ejw.203.1667915476425; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 05:51:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 14:51:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: KASAN / KUNIT: testing ran on qemu-arm and list of failures To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: open list , linux-stable , Kees Cook , Vlastimil Babka , David Gow , Gwan-gyeong Mun , Vitor Massaru Iha , Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 3:15 PM Naresh Kamboju wrote: > This is a report to get a quick update on kasan on qemu-arm. > > The KASAN / KUNIT testing ran on qemu-arm and the following test cases failed > and the kernel crashed. > > Following tests failed, > kasan_strings - FAILED > vmalloc_oob - FAILED > kasan_memchr - FAILED > kasan - FAILED > kasan_bitops_generic - FAILED > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Which isn't very strange since: > [ 429.920201] Insufficient stack space to handle exception! the system ran out of stack. With VMAP stack and IRQSTACKS there is really not much more memory we can provide. When I discussed this with syzbot it seemed they were using some really big userspace program written in Go that just used up all the virtual memory :P I don't know the nature of this test though. Using a lot of memory?? Yours, Linus Walleij