Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933560AbXHGNRQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:17:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759814AbXHGNQ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:16:58 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:59589 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758319AbXHGNQ4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:16:56 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: Qb6lAJ9zx9dD3xrnT53QL6mYuMCax+5GQnIaWL/zhnjk 1186492614 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:16:51 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh To: Tejun Heo Cc: Michael Sedkowski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Disk spin down issue on shut down/suspend to disk Message-ID: <20070807131651.GE30661@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <1186411815.4355.7.camel@nx6310> <20070806150159.GC31615@khazad-dum.debian.net> <200708061732.03425.rjw@sisk.pl> <46B75459.9020204@gmail.com> <1186424492.4355.1.camel@nx6310> <46B76BBC.9010107@gmail.com> <20070806234509.GC27640@khazad-dum.debian.net> <46B816FF.7060303@gmail.com> <20070807125104.GC30661@khazad-dum.debian.net> <46B86F21.4030805@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B86F21.4030805@gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1467 Lines: 32 On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Tejun Heo wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> approximately translates into "if you have too many boatmen on a ship, > >> it goes to mountain". We also have a bunch of Toshiba laptops which > > > > Yeah, that's a problem. But we can avoid it if we start snooping what ACPI > > is asking us to deliver to the disks, which IMO is an extremely good idea > > anyway. > > If it were done that way (by asking OS driver to deliver commands TFs), > I wouldn't have any problem at all. The spin down command is issued > from deep down in the acpi power off method - entering S5 directly > issues ATA commands bypassing the whole OS except for the ACPI > interpreter. It's just like the toshiba suspend crap and there's no > standard way to tell whether the acpi power off method is gonna do it or > not. We'll just have to blacklist it. Urk. I see. I'd also suggest adding a FAIL to the Linux firmware toolkit to any DSDT doing this. Who should we prod to add that check? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/