Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 09:59:54 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] soundwire: cadence: remove dma_data
Message-ID: <Y2sswmYa4cBBCuwV@matsya>
References: <20221101023521.2384586-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221101023521.2384586-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 01-11-22, 10:35, Bard Liao wrote:
> The use of dma_data is problematic for two reasons for the Cadence IP.
> a) the dai runtime data has nothing to do with DMAs in existing solutions
> b) we will use the dma_data for DMA-management in the future. We cannot
> share two separate pieces of information with the same dma_data pointer.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod