Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix memory leak in mount error path when using
 test_dummy_encryption
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Lu=c3=ads_Henriques?= <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc:     Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20221108143421.30993-1-lhenriques@suse.de>
 <215b729e-0af0-45d8-96af-3d3c319581c9@redhat.com> <Y2tz8zQPlTWtfOdw@suse.de>
From:   Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <444977b8-dbe3-1819-d4dd-b56a0a4aaf4f@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:40:01 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Y2tz8zQPlTWtfOdw@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk


On 09/11/2022 17:33, Luís Henriques wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 11:08:49AM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
>> On 08/11/2022 22:34, Luís Henriques wrote:
>>> Because ceph_init_fs_context() will never be invoced in case we get a
>>> mount error, destroy_mount_options() won't be releasing fscrypt resources
>>> with fscrypt_free_dummy_policy().  This will result in a memory leak.  Add
>>> an invocation to this function in the mount error path.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
>>> ---
>>> * Changes since v1:
>>>
>>> As suggested by Xiubo, moved fscrypt free from ceph_get_tree() to
>>> ceph_real_mount().
>>>
>>> (Also used 'git format-patch' with '--base' so that the bots know what to
>>> (not) do with this patch.)
>>>
>>>    fs/ceph/super.c | 1 +
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.c b/fs/ceph/super.c
>>> index 2224d44d21c0..f10a076f47e5 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ceph/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.c
>>> @@ -1196,6 +1196,7 @@ static struct dentry *ceph_real_mount(struct ceph_fs_client *fsc,
>>>    out:
>>>    	mutex_unlock(&fsc->client->mount_mutex);
>>> +	ceph_fscrypt_free_dummy_policy(fsc);
>>>    	return ERR_PTR(err);
>>>    }
>>>
>>> base-commit: 8b9ee21dfceadd4cc35a87bbe7f0ad547cffa1be
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 34ba9e6b37b68668d261ddbda7858ee6f83c82fa
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 87f1b323c29ab8d0a6d012d30fdc39bc49179624
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: c94f448ef026375b10748457a3aa46070aa7046e
>>>
>> LGTM.
>>
>> Thanks Luis.
>>
>> Could I fold this into the previous commit ?
> Yes, sure.  I'm fine with that.

Thanks.

I will mentioned this fix in that commit comments.

- Xiubo


>
> Cheers,
> --
> Luís
>