Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <fe352971-dcb2-c33f-285b-a47c40dbcf2a@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:05:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] soc: loongson: add GUTS driver for loongson-2
 platforms
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@loongson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
        Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        soc@kernel.org
References: <20221104024835.3570-1-zhuyinbo@loongson.cn>
 <57c9f565-e75b-0c8f-fdce-9dc8c334d50f@loongson.cn>
 <CACRpkda=-_a+gWQVk1vi4QJ30j-hzeraX-wr86RcQ9xne4-d6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkda=-_a+gWQVk1vi4QJ30j-hzeraX-wr86RcQ9xne4-d6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 09/11/2022 11:15, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 11:03 AM Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@loongson.cn> wrote:
> 
>> Hi maintainer,
>>
>> This patch I had verified that base on mainline 6.1-rc3 tree, it is
>> okay, if no other issue, please you help me merge it to upstream.
> 
> Aren't these loongarch maintainers listed in MAINTAINERS able to
> merge this? Certainly Huacai can merge stuff to drivers/soc as
> need be. drivers/soc is a bit shared between different archs.

The problem was they were not cc-ed on these patches for some reason.
Maybe the maintainers patterns are incorrect...

Best regards,
Krzysztof