Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 05:53:06 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, nfraprado@collabora.com,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: mediatek: Convert mtk-wdt
 to json-schema
Message-ID: <20221109135306.GA3538893@roeck-us.net>
References: <20221108033209.22751-1-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
 <20221108033209.22751-6-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
 <585a9cbb-4df4-1c06-ecfa-3b9442f1a5e2@gmail.com>
 <5758c2af-c2c5-dfbe-c7d8-036bbdaf71c7@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5758c2af-c2c5-dfbe-c7d8-036bbdaf71c7@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:04:09AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/11/2022 11:50, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 08/11/2022 04:32, Allen-KH Cheng wrote:
> >> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> >>
> >> Convert the MediaTek watchdog bindings to schema.
> >>
> >> The original binding only had 4 without a fallback but there is a reset
> >> controller on the "mediatek,mt7986-wdt", "mediatek,mt8186-wdt",
> >> "mediatek,mt8188-wdt" and "mediatek,mt8195-wdt" Since there is no reset
> >> controller for the mt6589, we remove "mediatek,mt6589-wdt" as a
> >> fallback.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> >> Co-developed-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >> Reviewed-by: N?colas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> > 
> > As I'm put as the maintainer:
> > Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Shall I take that through my tree or shall it go through the watchdog tree?
> > 
> 
> In general, bindings should go via subsystem trees (so watchdog), just
> like drivers. However this got Guenter's review tag, so usually it means
> also an ack... Dunno... :)

For watchdog patches, if I send a Reviewed-by: tag, I expect Wim to pick
up the patch through the watchdog tree. If I expect some other tree to
pick it up, I use Acked-by: and usually add a note saying that I assume
that the patch will be picked up by someone else.

I usually also add watchdog patches to my own watchdog-next tree as
reference for Wim. I already have several mediatek devicetree patches
queued there. Handling some of the patches through watchdog and others
through some other tree would create a mess. Please don't do that.

Guenter