Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221109160904.183147-1-mpfj@newflow.co.uk> <20221109160904.183147-2-mpfj@newflow.co.uk>
 <3c530543-6d89-bf63-8734-7ccb02aede84@linaro.org> <CAAbcLfjKxZfn8JW6h_k2S42_OHEU366xVm3U=3FWdacGTq6wZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <59ceb2d7-fb46-848e-163e-e0e54c9e6195@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <59ceb2d7-fb46-848e-163e-e0e54c9e6195@linaro.org>
From:   Mark Jackson <mpfj@newflow.co.uk>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:03:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAbcLfgJxAKhWVVZr5Q0A+Z-pHD=RS293mZRqQNyOmaihPv01w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: nanobone: Fix GPIO settings for RTS/CTS
 pins on UART3 & 4
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Cousson?= <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 16:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/11/2022 17:57, Mark Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 16:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09/11/2022 17:09, Mark Jackson wrote:
> >>> The NanoBone platform uses GPIO pins for RTS/CTS control.
> >>> The DTS still uses the hardware RTS/CTS pins so this needs fixing.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson <mpfj@newflow.co.uk>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-nano.dts | 8 ++++----
> >>
> >> You still use a bit odd subject prefixes. What did the log tell you for
> >> am335x files?
> >
> > Aha, now I understand ... I need to change "nanobone" in the title to
> > "am335x-nano" to match our dts file, correct ?
>
> Yes, I think this is the most popular subject prefix. It allows
> sub-architecture maintainers to understand what is it about.

Seems reasonable ... I was almost correct with my first attempt.
I'll send myself off for re-training ...

Cheers
Mark J.