Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 19:18:42 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        will@kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: errata: Workaround possible Cortex-A715
 [ESR|FAR]_ELx corruption
Message-ID: <Y2v9EiNR40x/cCQm@arm.com>
References: <20221027023915.1318100-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
 <20221027023915.1318100-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221027023915.1318100-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 08:09:15AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_MODIFY_PROT_TRANSACTION
> +static inline pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					   unsigned long addr,
> +					   pte_t *ptep)
> +{
> +	pte_t pte = ptep_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
>  
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Break-before-make (BBM) is required for all user space mappings
> +		 * when the permission changes from executable to non-executable
> +		 * in cases where cpu is affected with errata #2645198.
> +		 */
> +		if (pte_user_exec(pte) && cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198))
> +			__flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, false, 3);

Why not flush_tlb_page() here?

But more importantly, can we not use ptep_clear_flush() instead (and
huge_ptep_clear_flush())? They return the pte and do the TLBI.

-- 
Catalin