Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:21:01 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, geert+renesas@glider.be
Cc:     prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, geert+renesas@glider.be,
        magnus.damm@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, heiko@sntech.de,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, guoren@kernel.org,
        anup@brainfault.org, Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
        heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com,
        prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Add support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
Message-ID: <Y2wZvZLAENWh6qvs@spud>
References: <20221028165921.94487-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <mhng-563fb6cf-4505-4137-8da1-13f631e1c74f@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <mhng-563fb6cf-4505-4137-8da1-13f631e1c74f@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 11:55:24AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:59:14 PDT (-0700), prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> > 

> > Lad Prabhakar (7):
> >   dt-bindings: riscv: Sort the CPU core list alphabetically
> >   dt-bindings: riscv: Add Andes AX45MP core to the list
> >   riscv: Kconfig.socs: Add ARCH_RENESAS kconfig option
> >   riscv: dts: renesas: Add initial devicetree for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
> >   riscv: dts: renesas: Add minimal DTS for Renesas RZ/Five SMARC EVK
> >   MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Renesas RISC-V
> >   riscv: configs: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/Five SoC

> Geert was mentioning taking these though one of his trees, that works for me
> so
> 
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> 
> Happy to do a shared tag or whatever, but I think we can just skip that
> here.  The only conflicts would be defconfig and Kconfig.socs, but I don't
> think anything big is in the works for either -- unless Conor was planning
> on re-spinning that Kconfig.socs rework?

Uh, nah. I've got a wee bit (the removal of selects) that is "ready" but
there's zero urgency so it can wait for after v6.2-rc1. I don't think
it'd conflict anyway. The rest of it I need to sort out a v1 of, but I've
been distracted. Should be safe to take the defconfig & Kconfig.socs stuff
in terms of me doing anything.

Geert, would you be able to apply the first two patches on top of
v6.1-rc1 just in case, as you mentioned previously, it needs to become
part of a shared branch? Seems unlikely at this point in the cycle
though.

Thanks,
Conor.