Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <dd4deb4d-ec9e-8cbe-2835-d8b9931e7f30@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:22:43 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: support fault injection for flush submission
 error
To:     Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
        chao@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org
References: <20221110032522.64043-1-frank.li@vivo.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221110032522.64043-1-frank.li@vivo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/10/22 10:25, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Since we now support read, write, and discard in FAULT_INJECT,
> let's add support for flush.
> 
> This patch supports to inject fault into __submit_flush_wait() to
> simulate flush cmd io error.
> 

What about this description instead?

```
Since FAULT_INJECT have now support read, write, and discard operations,
add also flush support. An usecase is to inject fault into
__submit_flush_wait() to simulate flush cmd io error.
```

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara