Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:59:15 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Cc:     hdegoede@redhat.com, markgross@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
        hpa@zytor.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ashok.raj@intel.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, thiago.macieira@intel.com,
        athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@intel.com, sohil.mehta@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] IFS multi test image support and misc changes
Message-ID: <Y2zLYDmO1fkOmFgw@zn.tnic>
References: <20221021203413.1220137-1-jithu.joseph@intel.com>
 <20221107225323.2733518-1-jithu.joseph@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221107225323.2733518-1-jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 02:53:09PM -0800, Jithu Joseph wrote:
> Changes in v2
>  - Rebased ontop of v6.1-rc4
>  Boris
>    - Moved exported functions (microcode_sanity_check(),
>       find_matching_signature ) from microcode/intel.c to cpu/intel.c 
>       (patch4,6)
>    - Removed microcode metadata specific code changes to
>       microcode_sanity_check() (patch6)
>    - Moved find_meta_data() from common to IFS driver (Patch 8)

What's the upstreaming plan here - I'm assuming I should take the
microcode patches through the tip tree?

Or should I take the whole thing through tip so that there's no
confusion and having to sync and share branches between trees?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette