Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936028AbXHGWRY (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:17:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965448AbXHGWQq (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:16:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:32834 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965238AbXHGWQn (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:16:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:13:49 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, zippel@linux-m68k.org, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu, joel.becker@oracle.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, wli@holomorphy.com, jffs-dev@axis.com, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] move handling of setuid/gid bits from VFS into individual setattr functions (RESEND) Message-Id: <20070807181349.5d4175c7.jlayton@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20070807204909.GA30159@infradead.org> References: <200708061354.l76Ds3mU002255@dantu.rdu.redhat.com> <20070807204909.GA30159@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1162 Lines: 26 On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 21:49:09 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > First thanks a lot for doing this work, it's been long needed. > > Second please don't send out that many patches. We encourage people > to split things into small patches when the changes are logially > separated. Which these are not - it's a flag day change (which btw > is fine despite the rants soe people spewed in reply to this), so it > should be one single patch. (Or one for all mainline filesystems + > one per fs only in -mm to make Andrew's life a little easier if you > really care.) Thanks. I debated about how best to split these up. A coworker mentioned that Andrew had tossed him back a single patch that touched several mainline filesystems and asked him to break it up. I took that to mean that the patches should generally be split out, but I guess I took that too far ;-) -- Jeff Layton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/