Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935144AbXHHAoT (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:44:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758672AbXHHAoF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:44:05 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:50881 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756977AbXHHAoE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:44:04 -0400 Message-ID: <46B911C4.8010909@garzik.org> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:43:48 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Muli Ben-Yehuda CC: Andrew Morton , Yinghai Lu , Andi Kleen , riku.seppala@kymp.net, Andy Whitcroft , Chuck Ebbert , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion References: <46B3A7BB.9000102@redhat.com> <200708041130.42038.ak@suse.de> <20070804093222.f0d7f3c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200708050140.49590.ak@suse.de> <20070805050410.GB4960@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <86802c440708042238h39fa1b4ude2836fd9732213b@mail.gmail.com> <20070805075307.GA25890@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <20070807154911.5fe93b40.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070807225635.GJ4278@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20070807225635.GJ4278@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 984 Lines: 27 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:49:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> I am sooooooo tired of this thing. Andi, someone, can we for heaven's >> sake please just get it all sorted out? > > With regards to the sysdata conversion: Riku says he cannot test new > kernel. I haven't heard anything from Andy Whitcroft. It passes all of > my tests and what we have now is obviously broken... I think we should > put the fix in. Strongly agreed. It overall fixes bugs that existing _before_ the sysdata stuff went in. It was clear the NUMA node was /not initialized/ in all cases, and I think it's quite unfair to revert the sysdata stuff because of pre-existing bugs (that we are fixing right now anyway). Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/