Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp1847380rwb; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:59:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5oa8a1K93deeRtm/IgL3Cfssf3NfyeICmc2lqW/3c7EHIl+uFxaFBeCAlw055vdLsQtzVI X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e0d2:b0:7ad:9f03:aa1f with SMTP id gl18-20020a170906e0d200b007ad9f03aa1fmr1060890ejb.632.1668157163678; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:59:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668157163; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EEZiME4+Dde0/vaX2vTodN9Yzg2Ngkf/bE9y4QJX8le265mHr7fLTIttwVZ3uTbU0t 7DmY6OXv3quQE6EOAMNvhwsyzYANa7S/jAkn1kx26422ZZaMmm1FhOgyH5KjcSy6hyjC 4JeInFVdZtelmJqChxFNvs844j/Q5ib/tT+UaxpNb6/XKU9+f2SJVGZOGsDi8K3BGW3s DlboOQ0Ka19SoMbhutS/mw98mL8Up68gCGtBDll+M8SvN8RnmV8HAvnapVjn1SauD6bi KVlnLQFGHsPgD3XObeRRnDkKV3nYCw0AowrrEIQszbo7hLulmT6Nf5mxxn/CPR0WdA7j wA/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Lf3giwAMiTL69iTsaWeEw2qtvmJtf21YI6fNdLPl8xY=; b=MBPrSYDEJUPiJzKcIaC78JEoR/0yPABmY7LS4gxLB1ns2WSuCw9xi/Q89lQGzdPBlg hVbh8Zqf9EPge6dQUYmkjNNT3Osf4XHIS5W0af2dQCNAv1wf+xSDAX/03NUd5JZ25ero MIr6dk96FgTAbbLlI5erFto94sJPqNgTFO8D9iQs4Js9ryOzOWPv7PQzdnzPBsiJ58dp cQN27I/Hzs+v5E+6q3V8jUqOgyCUHhiBV1peDx/wDn6fR1725MgjGTSetqhDp34mADLW e6VWSSigcTT1tlqFFhUu+dKWaY3ypfu2vRmm5Xw/nrpFN0JjkNPbjaDKOPyxu1eS20J6 36Dw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.s=google header.b=K6+uHl5c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hd42-20020a17090796aa00b007ae5fa9b603si1881419ejc.374.2022.11.11.00.59.01; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:59:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.s=google header.b=K6+uHl5c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233210AbiKKI3e (ORCPT + 92 others); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:29:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233179AbiKKI3d (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:29:33 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8D3E79 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id kt23so10983006ejc.7 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:29:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Lf3giwAMiTL69iTsaWeEw2qtvmJtf21YI6fNdLPl8xY=; b=K6+uHl5cVWzocSa4VaSCNPJmC2aGjgNeNwXkrzp81/VEcm9IRSPo0Jtef7RLromQEM DlJu45EfyOTZOGy0dkqGjRFvTyUHI0c4vXViLVogbPVCuB38fOlPXI29LdZClY9m4V7w DzXwR9fAQOzb+AreQJ0UQHENe0QbfFffRls0QUUB4r4g6oYy6q7r1IYEBdXkJTD4w/sl vTHs2V8eJnOCY5LNIGScLu5Gmep7pBvy/korqQML0LOp3JTKYBEUir5RQc0IlAAqrvUw oLRcse9+0lp/TYn5y5ASJgebRqkoV5Q5xOitea+APB3heyumAN364iPCuM36E5pg/JwI jTIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Lf3giwAMiTL69iTsaWeEw2qtvmJtf21YI6fNdLPl8xY=; b=fqKASsoSvJXL1nJ149+2TSIwVLpAN9ytU5D3dqL6NulSWdNRtvS/cDfDtDarnqNWLb 0HN4J65Kdnz2QPnud7Ha0RQiOzNpZEB+VHblZG/40iwcs53VO5NQmXGrNaaYlc8POQTw t4TX5fWP4RC41BVD1gtUQBVsHwri5MmTEWOmdWIHqKnRTqQbeq/ZstzYPKrqRAPDnGOT o2s+NrdXyRnWS/HMZR3TCkeCyWe9tLQU1iwWn+BS1LxIBs0OUV2x1X8kikt3tihiVL/6 Rgk0tO0vEyq38uOZUCrUqUbpR303wbpqa6ZdWo6zY65KZnbNEhl4pZU5gkDrF+rFKPpx dnjw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plFiYf4ALY+KLBjfp72VjgHI+v+VvqCgaDmFGVtSzQgSHMTEm37 6KTu/2uX/BINlYwAwYdHZHKwmA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:249a:b0:781:fcf6:e73a with SMTP id e26-20020a170906249a00b00781fcf6e73amr1024035ejb.352.1668155370806; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cst2-173-16.cust.vodafone.cz. [31.30.173.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hd16-20020a170907969000b007ab1b4cab9bsm590498ejc.224.2022.11.11.00.29.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:29:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:29:29 +0100 From: Andrew Jones To: guoren@kernel.org Cc: anup@brainfault.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, heiko@sntech.de, philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu, alex@ghiti.fr, hch@lst.de, gary@garyguo.net, jszhang@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren , Anup Patel , Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] riscv: asid: Fixup stale TLB entry cause application crash Message-ID: <20221111082929.f5s5n53r63mkkney@kamzik> References: <20221111075902.798571-1-guoren@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221111075902.798571-1-guoren@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:59:02AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > From: Guo Ren > > After use_asid_allocator is enabled, the userspace application will > crash by stale TLB entries. Because only using cpumask_clear_cpu without > local_flush_tlb_all couldn't guarantee CPU's TLB entries were fresh. > Then set_mm_asid would cause the user space application to get a stale > value by stale TLB entry, but set_mm_noasid is okay. > > Here is the symptom of the bug: > unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 (coredump) > 0x0000003fd6d22524 <+4>: auipc s0,0x70 > 0x0000003fd6d22528 <+8>: ld s0,-148(s0) # 0x3fd6d92490 > => 0x0000003fd6d2252c <+12>: ld a5,0(s0) > (gdb) i r s0 > s0 0x8082ed1cc3198b21 0x8082ed1cc3198b21 > (gdb) x /2x 0x3fd6d92490 > 0x3fd6d92490: 0xd80ac8a8 0x0000003f > The core dump file shows that register s0 is wrong, but the value in > memory is correct. Because 'ld s0, -148(s0)' used a stale mapping entry > in TLB and got a wrong result from an incorrect physical address. > > When the task ran on CPU0, which loaded/speculative-loaded the value of > address(0x3fd6d92490), then the first version of the mapping entry was > PTWed into CPU0's TLB. > When the task switched from CPU0 to CPU1 (No local_tlb_flush_all here by > asid), it happened to write a value on the address (0x3fd6d92490). It > caused do_page_fault -> wp_page_copy -> ptep_clear_flush -> > ptep_get_and_clear & flush_tlb_page. > The flush_tlb_page used mm_cpumask(mm) to determine which CPUs need TLB > flush, but CPU0 had cleared the CPU0's mm_cpumask in the previous > switch_mm. So we only flushed the CPU1 TLB and set the second version > mapping of the PTE. When the task switched from CPU1 to CPU0 again, CPU0 > still used a stale TLB mapping entry which contained a wrong target > physical address. It raised a bug when the task happened to read that > value. > > CPU0 CPU1 > - switch 'task' in > - read addr (Fill stale mapping > entry into TLB) > - switch 'task' out (no tlb_flush) > - switch 'task' in (no tlb_flush) > - write addr cause pagefault > do_page_fault() (change to > new addr mapping) > wp_page_copy() > ptep_clear_flush() > ptep_get_and_clear() > & flush_tlb_page() > write new value into addr > - switch 'task' out (no tlb_flush) > - switch 'task' in (no tlb_flush) > - read addr again (Use stale > mapping entry in TLB) > get wrong value from old phyical > addr, BUG! > > The solution is to keep all CPUs' footmarks of cpumask(mm) in switch_mm, > which could guarantee to invalidate all stale TLB entries during TLB > flush. > > Fixes: 65d4b9c53017 ("RISC-V: Implement ASID allocator") > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Cc: Anup Patel > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt > --- > Changes in v3: > - Move set/clear cpumask(mm) into set_mm (Make code more pretty > with Andrew's advice) > - Optimize comment description > > Changes in v2: > - Fixup nommu compile problem (Thx Conor, Also Reported-by: kernel > test robot ) > - Keep cpumask_clear_cpu for noasid > --- > arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > index 7acbfbd14557..0f784e3d307b 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > @@ -205,12 +205,24 @@ static void set_mm_noasid(struct mm_struct *mm) > local_flush_tlb_all(); > } > > -static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu) > +static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, > + struct mm_struct *next, unsigned int cpu) > { > - if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) > - set_mm_asid(mm, cpu); > - else > - set_mm_noasid(mm); > + /* > + * The mm_cpumask indicates which harts' TLBs contain the virtual > + * address mapping of the mm. Compared to noasid, using asid > + * can't guarantee that stale TLB entries are invalidated because > + * the asid mechanism wouldn't flush TLB for every switch_mm for > + * performance. So when using asid, keep all CPUs footmarks in > + * cpumask() until mm reset. > + */ > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) { > + set_mm_asid(next, cpu); > + } else { > + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev)); > + set_mm_noasid(next); > + } > } > > static int __init asids_init(void) > @@ -264,7 +276,8 @@ static int __init asids_init(void) > } > early_initcall(asids_init); > #else > -static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu) > +static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, > + struct mm_struct *next, unsigned int cpu) > { > /* Nothing to do here when there is no MMU */ > } > @@ -317,10 +330,7 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next, > */ > cpu = smp_processor_id(); > > - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev)); > - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); > - > - set_mm(next, cpu); > + set_mm(prev, next, cpu); > > flush_icache_deferred(next, cpu); > } > -- > 2.36.1 > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones