Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
        Ludvig.Parsson@axis.com, jens.wiklander@linaro.org,
        etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Resolve dependency with TEE subsystem
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:23:13 +0530
Message-Id: <20221111095313.2010815-1-sumit.garg@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The OP-TEE SCMI transport channel is dependent on TEE subsystem to be
initialized first. But currently the Arm SCMI subsystem and TEE
subsystem are invoked on the same initcall level as subsystem_init().

It is observed that the SCMI subsystem initcall is invoked prior to TEE
subsystem initcall. This leads to unwanted error messages regarding TEE
bus is not present yet. Although, -EPROBE_DEFER tries to workaround that
problem.

Lets try to resolve inter subsystem dependency problem via shifting Arm
SCMI subsystem to subsystem_init_sync() initcall level.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index f818d00bb2c6..f43e52541da4 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -2667,7 +2667,7 @@ static int __init scmi_driver_init(void)
 
 	return platform_driver_register(&scmi_driver);
 }
-subsys_initcall(scmi_driver_init);
+subsys_initcall_sync(scmi_driver_init);
 
 static void __exit scmi_driver_exit(void)
 {
-- 
2.34.1