Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:05:37 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>,
        Shawn Tu <shawnx.tu@intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] media: ov2740: Remove duplicative pointer in
 struct nvm_data
Message-ID: <Y246keIq4a541ooO@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20220726120556.2881-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <YwTf22gkWxeyNKlR@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YwTf22gkWxeyNKlR@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 05:10:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 03:05:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The struct i2c_client pointer is used only to get driver data,
> > associated with a struct device or print messages on behalf.
> > Moreover, the very same pointer to a struct device is already
> > assigned by a regmap and can be retrieved from there.
> > No need to keep a duplicative pointer.
> 
> Thanks, Bungbu, for the review. Can it be now applied?

Don't see this being applied or commented why not...

Mauro? Or who is taking care of this driver nowadays?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko