Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp2527256rwb; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:31:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7ncshFMB1amBxpzUidSTBl3/Qa399AEdz9v14OR0/zss1xnnlsUT3p7dTnwnYZo8E4obyC X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b046:b0:7ae:50c6:453a with SMTP id bj6-20020a170906b04600b007ae50c6453amr2856511ejb.596.1668191482406; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:31:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668191482; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vpCnOOugALdXbczsOtR+hnybMbnSaddzHFlVvRNmofJjh77tUBXwDEPj9TnwvIUx1Z UKjEmMWvdmC0v3ANCua/cHXwSv+3ikEZKNg0j7onye1Q1udyTUR+uZzrg1iEcpVgL4bR d2V+F+xJrv6fsJYrOdokJRht4dwc+jPdwuSpYKKS3DEYghx+e15QdEe5SzhqvfA0jEN+ 6d3w3AS0LwyK9lYtlsFmbVYaGc+mqPN7dAnVazeB51/O182Wtcqp39ydPCYWsptcV6vQ /sgP2mpEfM3vQopTK52yRcqM0KnXfnKKiXIoOuKgg5mcrtUkmbnnTU/lbJIAOfLLWyus A0pQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=7pkTB54LPJsdsUqwRPGvS3gcvw3/5N8VpVOfJkiM6Mk=; b=o+t1HY8LrzrH4fgAkoHAOyA2smH1gSqnlSE1hEn7Nf60VBdlWDNAqpFslLD2XsSBEF Nb5kt7qJQ6a66t29RfBa8pdz+WgBOtANnrZ/3ThKtEtarDiQvOFOiuiMVIAOqxgGgmy9 Sq00oPQJK0XyiaPLQGvdlbcxbK/Xxq3vrFSjCj0ZRuaMx8Z+nGJe1QrgR84wO67Djlc6 +j1mgUveLh4boIbaxYQ/kh+xlj+fhSs6GqVkFUw0zF2f1NzdT7ZipF+MoNmZS3ae8IdV PkEo1rPyTGshMU/uJiuyP9KJZCAHoc92wDoZxvidCisaDGO7oeB+UIcDq30DZdj5FRqG 5Kgg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=NQJUR4Qe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a13-20020a170906274d00b007891fd9179bsi1193994ejd.150.2022.11.11.10.31.00; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:31:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=NQJUR4Qe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234094AbiKKSI6 (ORCPT + 90 others); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:08:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233681AbiKKSI4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:08:56 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8172F11172; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:08:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF37CB826C6; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF649C433D6; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:08:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1668190132; bh=1LwbWLiM0eqVngc+n5UKw3OXRN8eN1ijL20vt5kIfvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NQJUR4QerNZHhDnRP7Laix+cZafg1YpBOLxx7wPkLceEDUQOZFS4TNQvtRrE90sa7 CjJ7UfMtiXjon7StgiZOBKiQaOikJsp4D8ujESpsZiXlfyh2WBMeT+/Rt4sKAUtb58 OqVfmcpk7VnLvx5aYeDjIu5fJd/JMMDSziXi/Seb0FwnbA6UyEXQnk+Op8YCaFyW7W ifR/N6f4dd/cL/o4mQwNVywKm/LqSmQMA8bbnlRqVWJIgkCofb8UVIJnBzjdlur39Q NTfv5qIElFI0LjvcGzqyZ548P73zxN/OTnfLL3lBNfFc+mbE4PD0xzXK0S9kl6A8N5 qkK2PpdIWB41w== Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:08:49 -0600 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Sibi Sankar Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Georgi Djakov , Rob Herring , Konrad Dybcio , Mike Tipton , Johan Hovold , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add sm8350, sc8280xp and generic OSM L3 compatibles Message-ID: <20221111180849.hegnho4qeaewuzwz@builder.lan> References: <20221111032515.3460-1-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> <20221111032515.3460-6-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 04:02:42PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > > > On 11/11/22 08:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > Add EPSS L3 compatibles for sm8350 and sc8280xp, but while at it also > > introduce generic compatible for both qcom,osm-l3 and qcom,epss-l3. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson > > Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski > > --- > > > > Changes since v1: > > - Fixed oneOf to be valid schema > > - Fixed example to follow schema > > > > .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > > index bf538c0c5a81..aadae4424ba9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > > @@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ description: > > properties: > > compatible: > > - enum: > > - - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 > > - - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 > > + oneOf: > > + - items: > > + - enum: > > + - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 > > + - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 > > + - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 > > + - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 > > + - const: qcom,osm-l3 > > + - items: > > + - enum: > > + - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 > > + - qcom,sc8280xp-epss-l3 > > + - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 > > + - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3 > > + - const: qcom,epss-l3 > > isn't it incorrect to describe qcom,epss-l3 as a working > backup compatible for sc7280-epss-l3 and sm8250-epss-l3? > Shouldn't we just add another items list with those 2 as > enums? > I was about to agree, but the difference between the two sets are which registers we use to request the speed. And per our recent discussion, I was under the impression that this would be a property of BIT(0) in 0xb0 being set, not which platform we're running on. If that's the case then they are indeed compatible and we should adjust .ref_perf_state based on per-core DCVS being set or not. So I do think this description is appropriate... Regards, Bjorn > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -56,7 +64,7 @@ examples: > > #define RPMH_CXO_CLK 0 > > osm_l3: interconnect@17d41000 { > > - compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3"; > > + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", "qcom,osm-l3"; > > reg = <0x17d41000 0x1400>; > > clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;