Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <50a8517d-328e-2178-e98c-4b160456e092@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:21:45 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] x86/ioapic: Gate decrypted mapping on
 cc_platform_has() attribute
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>, hpa@zytor.com,
        kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
        decui@microsoft.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
        kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de,
        hch@infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
        isaku.yamahata@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        jane.chu@oracle.com, seanjc@google.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        iommu@lists.linux.dev
References: <1668147701-4583-1-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>
 <1668147701-4583-3-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1668147701-4583-3-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/10/22 22:21, Michael Kelley wrote:
>  	 * Ensure fixmaps for IOAPIC MMIO respect memory encryption pgprot
>  	 * bits, just like normal ioremap():
>  	 */
> -	flags = pgprot_decrypted(flags);
> +	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HAS_PARAVISOR))
> +		flags = pgprot_decrypted(flags);

This begs the question whether *all* paravisors will want to avoid a
decrypted ioapic mapping.  Is this _fundamental_ to paravisors, or it is
an implementation detail of this _individual_ paravisor?