Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp3374614rwb; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 04:44:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf64Dl6Egnkp3dIuhez8ZZRwWrKYCdiyJegLnIS5PaAR4/bEcD3TMS9CNly/s8ZvxQLq9Ilr X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:48c8:b0:212:e8da:fc3f with SMTP id li8-20020a17090b48c800b00212e8dafc3fmr6105980pjb.189.1668257080820; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 04:44:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668257080; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UCZJPT18nfzyz3ItmgVNiXpv8fmAeZQLmsSONRFU6t6ZkNp3jxJyLT6ZhQbK8ZXAS7 bYb3FI+NCXW8Z+s+1Ydr5PAxYv0Gr/8w4Bbh3OBKrCN0kUyXQ08nM9SInhrCAgGONcLF 34P7GDtJItVyRzBOv8BlQ1xOK+bDEkw/5S/zRz85kyZQyztg8L0xVcg//kZr7k/wu0h4 werNXUypyPgzNupHF0dCTIAhU2I6t/YVhRv46py2quQ7odBAKukg4TZgiL0LPbgzx7IL YgW25ckGgHmKxJVuhvOn8zhZNN78/wp6o/EzqE+3ZPDh1oxEFdtl6C0fDzv28v1rsMZw mxvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Dr4Vea0ZgfDIrh0NgQW5X1KnTm1YYJOqCu5lHDruVuo=; b=g+ZiZ8tK3egIImg5tyPrNFDEl8MwRjYaN2wWknGlcTTpu6Qz926WNmrJkT/SDagqnt Yu9Rsg6vxMq2DOOwt9eVo84OXUtKtl2jJb/Md6GrDyou6uB6kR0GpCtpvgTKzgnjFi1Y 2ESjktqmaX5Q0DlmnNY+dyqxGJ2aEJmYrgtl+eQx6JtOgzO8bpeRkif/jta2Gtwu620/ aqBqUmtZVNPnZ0MYpxN+mqJ8+Ij4Mu7MrOROBhidQvo/sgFyddJ/H+SjTPNXuucNLWmT xJav14klSz0tgcSClvcT/7Oas1nCUq8DtIH4150i4pDPGnbl3piXW2Gq8hdMX4mDjtnA 3J0g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=LyNePSje; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z18-20020aa79e52000000b0055cebb19fcdsi4554796pfq.237.2022.11.12.04.44.29; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 04:44:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=LyNePSje; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234758AbiKLL6U (ORCPT + 91 others); Sat, 12 Nov 2022 06:58:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45626 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231534AbiKLL6R (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2022 06:58:17 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFAD114D02 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 03:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id i10so9333121ejg.6 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 03:58:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Dr4Vea0ZgfDIrh0NgQW5X1KnTm1YYJOqCu5lHDruVuo=; b=LyNePSjeGke1N99yFA9QNQES3SGpxz5Cnv1ATBzBblS+nYYvj/fhpx3erl1MIHgyXz gljwcL3cUEr1/aBDJ55hdiM9mRVHOE7zShbXAIJeTUaa24ZzmJW1HmPbgCcG/HZZxXYW MG1tL6bjeKzMLMVSXbqo+9EqWMO4pOcimjUDCfWEIyUvS7z0djf1MLObXOHBG7DwNRtv gZBIkLTRn73yhITr6RQukRR9yylyqlHuMrO6qlSMY+oUA3V9gd0WHjznrfXdt3dMj05F Vl8CXcvgmlDCmgZKfDtDPTuXXWX8w26p3WM2Ij7Q62CWqO7G8BN9gezOUYrE/vc+3Fmp Hjcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Dr4Vea0ZgfDIrh0NgQW5X1KnTm1YYJOqCu5lHDruVuo=; b=XLm5RdvefX1xY8zD+BdI6MrbXgHUJhSw2TAT8g3eT+a55lhPb6x0TznKQOHAZ4RNX7 qdYdQanOyVa3rLCodcNsT2wtpszks1ezX4ZoFTxmhSDQQMVOSEcRAVwqUlY/MTAmgcA0 lSdguoHKkDI0QncMup+SHjMUE7cMmYTsTBEaBBiETrRpzqF4SBqrGHttfvu0T3Iatuec VhY57g0cu4DHr5jBXemdXjhUXDsQXeFrWx5qWDGvBVpJVF5UOzeQ7Pqfa/vgzGH3C6gQ VbLk4/mV5joRzQfRllNEKQ7XBGqcoRg0yY3Vuk24UKBO8oXjDAzD3YXhLZS6psIXFio0 R35g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkTZIYGuRIf+eyNZyA0DISjlZD/zKXLl/3H4S59m2QACqD9nmoe 5T4YeZOPbnkHspzfOy6JQ9aQ6UuShO+7Aj4+XCLN4gIO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f2c3:b0:78d:d762:5457 with SMTP id gz3-20020a170906f2c300b0078dd7625457mr5248096ejb.67.1668254295317; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 03:58:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221112074759.GA5111@1wt.eu> <20221112113410.GA5553@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20221112113410.GA5553@1wt.eu> From: A Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:28:04 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setting variable NULL after freeing it. To: Willy Tarreau Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS,FROM_LOCAL_HEX,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 5:04 PM Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 04:18:37PM +0530, A wrote: > > > > > > It depends. What's important is not to let a pointer exist to a freed > > > location, so if you're doing: > > > > > > kfree(card->pool); > > > > > > then it's usually important to follow this by: > > > > > > card->pool = NULL; > > > > > > > I checked in kernel but at many places this is not being done. I can > > change all that code. But, will the patch be accepted? > > > > So, if someone is doing - > > > > kfree(x) > > ._some_code_ > > ._some_code_ > > ._some_code_ > > > > Then I can change it to - > > > > kfree(x) > > x = NULL; > > ._some_code_ > > ._some_code_ > > ._some_code_ > > > > But, will the patch be accepted for this change? > > I don't think so, for the reasons I explained previously, > unless you spot real bugs there during your reviews, of > course. Better focus on your own driver for now in my > opinion. > I was just thinking that when this is good practice (where its usage is genuine), then why is there not a kernel wide macro that would call kfree(x) and then set (x) = NULL. So, this will be done automatically for everyone and the developer will not have to decide whether to do this or not. Amit