Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp4145577rwb; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:11:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf68UokvYryFuRc20vnXah9wbmbcloYTuHS01hG7TFz8T5WHYZ3t1stbZYKkKZjOz3ptuxRo X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:11db:b0:7ad:a030:7501 with SMTP id va27-20020a17090711db00b007ada0307501mr7049099ejb.446.1668323480850; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:11:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668323480; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N4YfSbieWT8DNzxb8Kk8zYtHuN+4F8VljfE6qAiSSFPwrTttneJCx09zrCEZg+iNEJ bPwfhStu4/kvT8DhE+jjQvIIOxc83euLR46mAR7DD9EfC/2aUt8QyouKh9vHF7ONDVaK Ldq63UQI7kbt2Y5Yx/51u7nz3ssAq1nMNacoB49mP/4DpuWbZ+PwZTFseQUD9ZT8f1dj ZCksemyMvA4TPQ/sYitxUuVYmsK2pMmh6l8ZEMGbb/OVX7zXR4DvEEWY4hyBtg/Eg5aG lic1RQKv6wLMOonoJRZEtx9P7vuyG0Em8SW1l9JqKFzfLWxu/8SGN47NflI/My/G0R87 JJQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; bh=5Fko7CqOFciJ6I5L4m6ljCKm19maYn8FN+jvlIDySpk=; b=U1/KG4lRD3aMGzVnxPnoA5zU5z9vzqsxaGYvxyOo+ZENMYWBUdy6KLURbc0k53IVeA GVEkFXFuqPKaCwqTtrYuLRWmV+Aca+F/+xn8UNpYM6xitiB9LQp4A/1EKPWw5/L0YKZ4 SVn4w6TlgDT1WU8Ca9VCmhnJZv7fcwKK2i6WKCJE0Ueq9lUrXCHxvZsacjm9owdOlG+h NV02I5BlaxJpYi9TP7R+8qlvKpAl8PS6MkkAVMYGtD5mSz4pKnpcDevxwqjhuTVhoTMk BACvPYABw/5RR1ZxO8C0oP9hBbgicQ7qEGSN6vDQfUJqWLff3rGTgnAqVQkZ3r3sldV8 6IuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i15-20020a50870f000000b0046154884604si6450011edb.482.2022.11.12.23.10.44; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:11:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235085AbiKMGtt (ORCPT + 90 others); Sun, 13 Nov 2022 01:49:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54886 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231694AbiKMGtq (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2022 01:49:46 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD221144C for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 22:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4N932Y12QFzmVsh; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 14:49:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.230] (10.174.176.230) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 14:49:42 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 14:49:41 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Fix wild-memory-access in register_synth_event() To: Tom Zanussi , , , , References: <20221108083124.27218-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com> <20221108083124.27218-3-shangxiaojing@huawei.com> From: shangxiaojing In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.230] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/11/13 5:24, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Hi Shang, > > On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 16:31 +0800, Shang XiaoJing wrote: >> In register_synth_event(), if set_synth_event_print_fmt() failed, then >> both trace_remove_event_call() and unregister_trace_event() will be >> called. If call->event.funcs is not NULL, then the trace_event_call will >> call __unregister_trace_event() twice. As the result, the second >> __unregister_trace_event() will causes the wild-memory-access. >> >> register_synth_event >>     set_synth_event_print_fmt failed >>     trace_remove_event_call >>         event_remove >>             if call->event.funcs then >>             __unregister_trace_event (first call) >>     unregister_trace_event >>         __unregister_trace_event (second call) >> >> Fix the bug by avoiding to call the second __unregister_trace_event() by >> checking if the first one is called. >> >> general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address >>         0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI >> KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range >> [0xdead000000000120-0xdead000000000127] >> CPU: 0 PID: 3807 Comm: modprobe Not tainted >> 6.1.0-rc1-00186-g76f33a7eedb4 #299 >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS >> rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 >> RIP: 0010:unregister_trace_event+0x6e/0x280 >> Code: 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 0e 02 00 00 48 >> b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 63 08 4c 89 e2 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 >> 00 0f 85 e2 01 00 00 49 89 2c 24 48 85 ed 74 28 e8 7a 9b >> RSP: 0018:ffff88810413f370 EFLAGS: 00010a06 >> RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888105d050b0 RCX: 0000000000000000 >> RDX: 1bd5a00000000024 RSI: ffff888119e276e0 RDI: ffffffff835a8b20 >> RBP: dead000000000100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff0913481 >> R10: ffffffff8489a407 R11: fffffbfff0913480 R12: dead000000000122 >> R13: ffff888105d050b8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888105d05028 >> FS:  00007f7823e8d540(0000) GS:ffff888119e00000(0000) >> knlGS:0000000000000000 >> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> CR2: 00007f7823e7ebec CR3: 000000010a058002 CR4: 0000000000330ef0 >> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 >> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 >> Call Trace: >>   >>  __create_synth_event+0x1e37/0x1eb0 >>  create_or_delete_synth_event+0x110/0x250 >>  synth_event_run_command+0x2f/0x110 >>  test_gen_synth_cmd+0x170/0x2eb [synth_event_gen_test] >>  synth_event_gen_test_init+0x76/0x9bc [synth_event_gen_test] >>  do_one_initcall+0xdb/0x480 >>  do_init_module+0x1cf/0x680 >>  load_module+0x6a50/0x70a0 >>  __do_sys_finit_module+0x12f/0x1c0 >>  do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 >>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd >> >> Fixes: 4b147936fa50 ("tracing: Add support for 'synthetic' events") >> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> --- >>  kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c | 2 ++ >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c >> index e310052dc83c..a51280a153e3 100644 >> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c >> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c >> @@ -830,6 +830,8 @@ static int register_synth_event(struct synth_event *event) >>         ret = set_synth_event_print_fmt(call); >>         if (ret < 0) { >>                 trace_remove_event_call(call); >> +               if (call->event.funcs) >> +                       return ret; >>                 goto err; >>         } >>   out: > > Good catch, thanks for finding this bug! > > It looks like call->event.funcs will always be true here since it's set > to &synth_event_funcs above. > > So it seems like you could just call trace_remove_event_call() and fall > through for this (ret < 0) case? If so, it might be good to put a > comment there noting that trace_remove_event_call() will call > unregister_trace_event(), so it's ok to just return. > Ok, will fix in v2. Thanks, -- Shang XiaoJing