Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp4743907rwb; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:39:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4epsKVE1MqL5lehXkSCAr1BYWBs+/fqwk1rdDbYhFYsOE7krUc5mEBejnxKFVyzWYpv0RZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:278a:b0:176:a9d6:ed53 with SMTP id jw10-20020a170903278a00b00176a9d6ed53mr10843090plb.5.1668371976913; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:39:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668371976; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XKXh8Miz2myvL+UEjkpnQf1zvCD3o+eh+BRB3oEJq1eSOmdy+DxrOk6UEBs3lXTxHn P/2fJ9p49nivXk9V+A8Uq7xqIjbNSHNXISbFyzGJyEDZTsG3ze2MNxBJtTQ1vHuxoFec ncrVHpaV4mSSCAMUu+U+QUJRucJ35LNsSJR+ykVWUKTQcxSSeTTLmlcRhk7DFEmKpBuo De7Yfem+cj4Lqq+3KFixR3DESPGgFj6Hw1bY24hoLUEu1RDpGULUZKbdKyzM9MEaOjg5 /8ak8jAHasB1AYLIU/QcqQsZElMMUPWnc0gHb5OtSUdfv+FUdN6pSSMEwG/8DTUakKEO IORA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=O/ER1ekezzOv3F8Ciluw8xgCaX8S1yaPfYHKGTCnyOM=; b=F54WKRJfn7wFOgZFxdQDigmZkaVycKGgk8KYpv0WAT1G5PEZhydhnCp/OujTb6sDAJ AHC4PwqpzLnfj7PhE+Xw+d9RnibokCu07Zv7J9tMxZ1ACc71LvM14np2lQE63PMKdmGJ EklckMloiSypWLsuOL1dzdyVN3RISVg2J3MiUbMoE/VI1twsytbFR5nuFT5eHK3AKuGo S6n8ZoYLP37m1K9Q6qzTKDO/K+EOzk+a4Zx8evvWWmF6yGSW3mQ3Fz/VkRmNxAX8aaxN fA62Hq4Xzu47fYHhqXZrPwLW2W/dqqkV737N5QRVBgi4GR/2a713Rdy6LVV2X9HIJHT3 2cYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=fq1tFo1K; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q17-20020a63e211000000b0043c8ce98a7bsi8211595pgh.802.2022.11.13.12.39.16; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=fq1tFo1K; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235431AbiKMUb3 (ORCPT + 90 others); Sun, 13 Nov 2022 15:31:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230525AbiKMUb1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2022 15:31:27 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9055512608; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:31:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C69A60BDB; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 20:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFD59C433D6; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 20:31:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1668371485; bh=Z3hKGPb3JVjXMwmS/Knu2xoEPDWXo+XzHB0SUKGU1MI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fq1tFo1Ks4huQqkpuAB7lbl7qnjDuhG7E+DJEFMViWMTlO/GSyicK/f0VBEUOU2+r Xv0qnW7VqdvRwjmuSAF6xfR42U/FOC+OOlzbfTSa7HSBkGuWiFOZpWF3YPGU/r0EMc 9U1eH6aQB+pWcyGh6La4SIkI3gIon4HwQwTHFwGdr2cDHX1NI3bf3yTzMrFzpEmWhV yVYlBFB85gk3tF/diWjOWSC9EAFvAL6FHYv23FJ6liOS6xhrppkWr5Bz2OLtW8vg8W U9R2+Z69+u4yAfWihGILYo7IQXwV6Rit61wO7vJEbdNuhHK6P7YvNE4BQaehWZJ6q1 NtVR3K7q066OQ== Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:31:23 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Evan Green Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, gwendal@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, apronin@chromium.org, Pavel Machek , Ben Boeckel , rjw@rjwysocki.net, jejb@linux.ibm.com, Kees Cook , dlunev@google.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, Matthew Garrett , jarkko@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Jason Gunthorpe , Peter Huewe , axelj Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] tpm: Add support for in-kernel resetting of PCRs Message-ID: References: <20221111231636.3748636-1-evgreen@chromium.org> <20221111151451.v5.1.I776854f47e3340cc2913ed4d8ecdd328048b73c3@changeid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221111151451.v5.1.I776854f47e3340cc2913ed4d8ecdd328048b73c3@changeid> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 03:16:26PM -0800, Evan Green wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > index 1621ce8187052c..886277b2654e3b 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > @@ -342,6 +342,53 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 pcr_idx, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_pcr_extend); > > +/** > + * tpm2_pcr_reset - Reset the specified PCR Should this function be in drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c instead of here? > + * @chip: A &struct tpm_chip instance, %NULL for the default chip > + * @pcr_idx: The PCR to be reset > + * > + * Return: Same as with tpm_transmit_cmd(), or ENOTTY for TPM1 devices. > + */ > +int tpm2_pcr_reset(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 pcr_idx) The callers of this function assume it returns a negative errno value. But actually it can return positive TPM2_RC_* error codes as well. Probably you should make it only return negative errno values. > +{ > + struct tpm2_null_auth_area auth_area; > + struct tpm_buf buf; > + int rc; > + > + chip = tpm_find_get_ops(chip); > + if (!chip) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) { > + rc = -ENOTTY; > + goto out; > + } > + > + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_PCR_RESET); > + if (rc) > + goto out; > + > + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, pcr_idx); > + > + auth_area.handle = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_RS_PW); > + auth_area.nonce_size = 0; > + auth_area.attributes = 0; > + auth_area.auth_size = 0; > + > + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, sizeof(struct tpm2_null_auth_area)); sizeof(struct tpm2_null_auth_area) => sizeof(auth_area) > + tpm_buf_append(&buf, (const unsigned char *)&auth_area, unsigned char => u8 Also, since the code to append a "null" authorization area appears in both tpm2_pcr_reset() and tpm2_pcr_extend(), perhaps it should be refactored into a helper function? > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h > index dfeb25a0362dee..70134e6551745f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/tpm.h > +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h > @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes { > TPM2_CC_HIERARCHY_CONTROL = 0x0121, > TPM2_CC_HIERARCHY_CHANGE_AUTH = 0x0129, > TPM2_CC_CREATE_PRIMARY = 0x0131, > + TPM2_CC_PCR_RESET = 0x013D, > TPM2_CC_SEQUENCE_COMPLETE = 0x013E, > TPM2_CC_SELF_TEST = 0x0143, > TPM2_CC_STARTUP = 0x0144, > @@ -293,6 +294,13 @@ struct tpm_header { > }; > } __packed; > > +struct tpm2_null_auth_area { > + __be32 handle; > + __be16 nonce_size; > + u8 attributes; > + __be16 auth_size; > +} __packed; struct tpm2_null_auth_area is only used by code in drivers/char/tpm/, so should its declaration go in the internal header drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h instead? - Eric