Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp5306865rwb; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 02:33:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6WDOnBg39dAEhSRJlTJREs/NB+7brfTXMaaU0ZROZ0zBQVTV6LJ1V46Pti7VCvPRcwZGHW X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4f06:b0:20a:2547:907 with SMTP id p6-20020a17090a4f0600b0020a25470907mr13390247pjh.37.1668422009994; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 02:33:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668422009; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=K8nK7V7+zogikoSPYbvS88BPkRUgY/KNgcPXil2tyoyxY/0vKDbAKA6mEot8oYBXKg 908HV0+QEYZyXi3SK0SSWdzazoh1aDdHmE5bfP7Ri+hGKK+fKJ1zTMX78DH1gGrrQYM4 I/NfHkojYnU4T/7iFCa1hCzq7IaBLq9gJb+2Js5yhn+DrTRhQeCF1Ne4C1nqDMoNV/kh KujLCUERXKZNw7QcbCZXneyoAEPiJ8mEUYZ2ymwJ07cvbsimj+wTtUAS4YVAQDiqDaqh 3K3Z2WmCZkA8t+7IkmiGHBOlhN4s2aYOlJ8THjsZjLKDN32MoLTlzJ+i57xwL2Hh+7ec QnwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=YOB5ovzwG41qBNYEX8G5z12o/BuLOtHt6/b8j0c3Fwg=; b=TjS7pVD/OKUABYhXSwiYsQyCGlLFuP0IPsO2CHIR49e++GN/+qDiO01VC+yPPcKwHI 5Ah3IVeFgs6ZUP0mWnhvy/zHilxPTuXVHBq+OaqqjdnEkD6I12NjQCt1q2BLhNV0Ghyt VitdVrrrzfVv7kAk84qdN3xZmk6qR3PnuMqM9ELe5tz2aLKyHWisjnCuBLroidolHqSK /W8doZTek/GOzAavUk2wbg2UoGr1d0Xghw2i7bEIaNlKsP4l8hXkOtx8N9XJtejZ5gcP 1KZVEZufFIXmeACe+U/OtEYvt/0vQvUVQ2XTEtQEFUxQeXgvN0NCtdCLIbPFn1vHJAAX RONg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="TfF5I/J5"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pt9-20020a17090b3d0900b00200b2891af7si14284120pjb.66.2022.11.14.02.33.17; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 02:33:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="TfF5I/J5"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236005AbiKNKIv (ORCPT + 88 others); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 05:08:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42238 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236229AbiKNKIQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 05:08:16 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E68CE0 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 02:07:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668420423; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YOB5ovzwG41qBNYEX8G5z12o/BuLOtHt6/b8j0c3Fwg=; b=TfF5I/J5bZb/NFFnvxb7NrSKyu2iFvuKvr/Wa8A3NOA9LzQrv1dB+gB8TH4F28Eo7hiK7r chD+nkuNyLqZhNxctfejC/9bHL3BlxZbhMJl16f65ylmB1L8VYiUWkRM0O/6Rgvtn4t2J4 simanrGpZSD7pV5eSO82hD0LDDnTFeI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-310-Aw8vjTctObut8IMzRN_KUg-1; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 05:06:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Aw8vjTctObut8IMzRN_KUg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74EE101A54E; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-71.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.71]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57E71731B; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 18:06:49 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Stephen Brennan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, urezki@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm/vmalloc.c: allow vread() to read out vm_map_ram areas Message-ID: References: <20221109033535.269229-1-bhe@redhat.com> <20221109033535.269229-4-bhe@redhat.com> <87v8nnfwud.fsf@oracle.com> <87mt8yfxy6.fsf@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mt8yfxy6.fsf@oracle.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.5 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/10/22 at 10:48am, Stephen Brennan wrote: > Baoquan He writes: > > > On 11/09/22 at 04:59pm, Stephen Brennan wrote: > > ...... > >> > @@ -3569,12 +3609,14 @@ long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count) > >> > if (!count) > >> > break; > >> > > >> > - if (!va->vm) > >> > + if (!(va->flags & VMAP_RAM) && !va->vm) > >> > continue; > >> > > >> > vm = va->vm; > >> > - vaddr = (char *) vm->addr; > >> > - if (addr >= vaddr + get_vm_area_size(vm)) > >> > + vaddr = (char *) va->va_start; > >> > + size = vm ? get_vm_area_size(vm) : va_size(va); > >> > >> Hi Baoquan, > >> > >> Thanks for working on this. I tested your patches out by using drgn to > >> debug /proc/kcore. I have a kernel module[1] to do a vm_map_ram() call > >> and print the virtual address to the kernel log so I can try to read > >> that memory address in drgn. When I did this test, I got a panic on the > >> above line of code. > > ...... > >> Since flags is in a union, it shadows "vm" and causes the condition to > >> be true, and then get_vm_area_size() tries to follow the pointer defined > >> by flags. I'm not sure if the fix is to have flags be a separate field > >> inside vmap_area, or to have more careful handling in the vread path. > > > > Sorry, my bad. Thanks for testing this and catching the error, Stephen. > > > > About the fix, both way are fine to me. I made a draft fix based on the > > current patchset. To me, adding flags in a separate field makes code > > easier, but cost extra memory. I will see what other people say about > > this, firstly if the solution is acceptable, then reusing the union > > field or adding anohter flags. > > > > Could you try below code to see if it works? > > I tried the patch below and it worked for me: reading from vm_map_ram() > regions in drgn was fine, gave me the correct values, and I also tested > reads which overlapped the beginning and end of the region. Thanks a lot for the testing. > > That said (and I don't know the vmalloc code well at all), I wonder > whether you can be confident that the lower 2 bits of the va->vm pointer > are always clear? It looks like it comes from kmalloc, and so it should > be aligned, but can slab red zones mess up that alignment? Hmm, it should be OK. I am also worried about the other places of va->vm checking. I will check code again to see if there's risk in the case you mentioned. I may change to add another ->flags field into vmap_area in v2 post. > > I also tested out this patch on top of yours, to be a bit more cautious. > I think we can be confident that the remaining bits are zero when used > as flags, and non-zero when used as a pointer, so you can test them to > avoid any overlap. But it's probably too cautious. > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index 78cae59170d8..911974f32b23 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -3613,7 +3613,7 @@ long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count) > if (!va->vm) > continue; > > - flags = va->flags & VMAP_FLAGS_MASK; > + flags = (va->flags & ~VMAP_FLAGS_MASK) ? 0 : (va->flags & VMAP_FLAGS_MASK); > vm = va->vm; > > vaddr = (char *) va->va_start; >