Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <8c7b25f0-aee2-c3ee-c6da-3432b6513c57@marcan.st>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:06:50 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] cpufreq: apple-soc: Add new driver to control
 Apple SoC CPU P-states
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, asahi@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20221024043925.25379-1-marcan@marcan.st>
 <20221024043925.25379-5-marcan@marcan.st>
 <20221102061819.dyl5ah6qffntqieh@vireshk-i7>
 <c3b88bae-f6da-4242-0b19-5e2a32b9c266@marcan.st>
 <20221114065116.zs67pkbhhgfoze52@vireshk-i7>
 <367270ad-114a-96ca-a92a-a7f54a5f3318@marcan.st>
 <20221114070323.gjwgllfd44hthwon@vireshk-i7>
From:   Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
In-Reply-To: <20221114070323.gjwgllfd44hthwon@vireshk-i7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

For the benefit of everyone else: I screwed up a reply from mobile and
ended up with a brief exchange offline, but here's the useful part of
the context. Viresh also pointed out dropping opp-shared if we don't use
that mechanism, so I'll do that for v4.

On 14/11/2022 16.03, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-11-22, 15:57, Hector Martin wrote:
>> There is no way to express this relationship with OPP tables without
>> duplicating the tables themselves.
> 
> Can you show how the DT looks in this case ? I am still not clear on what the
> scenario is here :(

Here's the most complicated one we have so far: 20 cores and 6 clusters
sharing 2 OPP tables (mind the include and define fun - this is the best
way we could come up with to express two SoC dies glued together into
one MCM).

https://github.com/AsahiLinux/linux/blob/asahi-wip/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t6002.dtsi

- Hector