Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp5355504rwb; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 03:29:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7uXJ3zr/fzvsKYrt0oGQhrIb6itYmBWsOujAM1KXb0lR2jTkyXniRn2lmLvjYZRU8gMH/Y X-Received: by 2002:a63:481c:0:b0:470:514e:1f15 with SMTP id v28-20020a63481c000000b00470514e1f15mr11553206pga.358.1668425383908; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668425383; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aed/xzW9ao/XR3IF1xVvrM8ZNA3XIBQ67OaABRu7tKilpQ8d8/JeiMFv7zVjFHj0jf aHB5gLGs6923VidfrF2+2haJOnO3H15/Bm5esrAvby31Ctsvs5CmNPDQBmTxrcMmdIV5 xeDMrbbop6LubysPywejv7Jf+C2c2e2uA5wtp1f/oMUjreytIJaC1d305k3SEAEM+NOQ ql3gvU7JqN5mv7r/3pgL743Qv5aDVLlUZkpp3t2i3qOSz1CyfTWHBWfTUHG/pxLwDK2r fz2lkSoJkwetJcif05mXwT2UVpkEuSFgfXNF1gydVZYiysDmYw07KcbNfRiEhhbS+RSQ iyVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=bUb41i7VO7VxnsYUwsMZ/JkSHnUmQ0QMidgwWi/251I=; b=T7EkzYn+KSo0Y1deXRS2QXlCZ9U0il7Uqc6x5MW8elOjajeH3pDK8tYU4BY2J2c4vQ KDi6xoKnwTqPIkBt8sH7jj8t+yXQpl2UObHa49YGSUhlg9TyzDSX2v+B8eVzFp2FTbsK +il4jSF0+6fUU+I3qmmeTKUMEC6150q/mrp2jW6SkkLrLc35oVqx7gtsCXfsIO0KQvn+ MHIbTZM8i1lgtIn3QZLwdeBLoEfYOBVpPjUT2DoGXmhJkM2G2Aaqah1feCosl2GBl28h 6yOXtp06tbiJpZJD5hlM8Y0uS/91SSJRP5+qNRvJoYcfNjgBT+6pOhHgt0ovSig4++JC WqsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x32-20020a17090a6c2300b00212ca8e7457si8956181pjj.133.2022.11.14.03.29.32; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236266AbiKNLRk (ORCPT + 88 others); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 06:17:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42826 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236179AbiKNLQu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 06:16:50 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F421518E10; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 03:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7634F23A; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 03:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.70.83] (unknown [10.57.70.83]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AFE83F73D; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 03:14:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4be2b6bf-eb60-511d-dfd1-90d91c02c105@arm.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:14:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] perf test: Replace brstack test workload Content-Language: en-US To: German Gomez , Namhyung Kim , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Leo Yan , Zhengjun Xing , Athira Jajeev References: <20221110181920.84900-1-namhyung@kernel.org> <20221110181920.84900-11-namhyung@kernel.org> <1036a42b-b438-67b2-c4ca-0e440d266d6d@arm.com> From: James Clark In-Reply-To: <1036a42b-b438-67b2-c4ca-0e440d266d6d@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/2022 19:20, German Gomez wrote: > Hi Namhyung, thanks for doing the refactor, it looks a lot cleaner > > On 10/11/2022 18:19, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> So that it can get rid of requirement of a compiler. Also rename the >> symbols to match with the perf test workload. >> >> Cc: German Gomez >> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim >> --- >> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh | 66 +++++--------------------- >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh >> index ec801cffae6b..a8a182dea25f 100755 >> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh >> @@ -4,18 +4,12 @@ >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> # German Gomez , 2022 >> >> -# we need a C compiler to build the test programs >> -# so bail if none is found >> -if ! [ -x "$(command -v cc)" ]; then >> - echo "failed: no compiler, install gcc" >> - exit 2 >> -fi >> - >> # skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling >> # and if the architecture doesn't support filter types: any,save_type,u >> perf record -b -o- -B --branch-filter any,save_type,u true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2 >> >> TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d /tmp/__perf_test.program.XXXXX) >> +TESTPROG="perf test -w brstack" >> >> cleanup() { >> rm -rf $TMPDIR >> @@ -23,57 +17,24 @@ cleanup() { >> >> trap cleanup exit term int >> >> -gen_test_program() { >> - # generate test program >> - cat << EOF > $1 >> -#define BENCH_RUNS 999999 >> -int cnt; >> -void bar(void) { >> -} /* return */ >> -void foo(void) { >> - bar(); /* call */ >> -} /* return */ >> -void bench(void) { >> - void (*foo_ind)(void) = foo; >> - if ((cnt++) % 3) /* branch (cond) */ >> - foo(); /* call */ >> - bar(); /* call */ >> - foo_ind(); /* call (ind) */ >> -} >> -int main(void) >> -{ >> - int cnt = 0; >> - while (1) { >> - if ((cnt++) > BENCH_RUNS) >> - break; >> - bench(); /* call */ >> - } /* branch (uncond) */ >> - return 0; >> -} >> -EOF >> -} >> - >> test_user_branches() { >> echo "Testing user branch stack sampling" >> >> - gen_test_program "$TEMPDIR/program.c" >> - cc -fno-inline -g "$TEMPDIR/program.c" -o $TMPDIR/a.out >> - >> - perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- $TMPDIR/a.out > /dev/null 2>&1 >> + perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- ${TESTPROG} > /dev/null 2>&1 >> perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstacksym | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script >> >> # example of branch entries: >> - # foo+0x14/bar+0x40/P/-/-/0/CALL >> + # brstack_foo+0x14/brstack_bar+0x40/P/-/-/0/CALL >> >> set -x >> - egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/IND_CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> - egrep -m1 "^foo\+[^ ]*/bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> - egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> - egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> - egrep -m1 "^bar\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/RET$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> - egrep -m1 "^foo\+[^ ]*/bench\+[^ ]*/RET$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> - egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/bench\+[^ ]*/COND$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> - egrep -m1 "^main\+[^ ]*/main\+[^ ]*/UNCOND$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/IND_CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/brstack_bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack_bar\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/RET$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/brstsack_bench\+[^ ]*/RET$" $TMPDIR/perf.script > > Small typo here s/brstsack_bench/brstack_bench With this typo fixed and with the other "-b" fix mentioned: Tested-by: James Clark > > I think James was doing some BRBE work here, so probably best if he also gives his review/test tag. > > Acked-by: German Gomez > >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/COND$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> + egrep -m1 "^brstack\+[^ ]*/brstack\+[^ ]*/UNCOND$" $TMPDIR/perf.script >> set +x >> >> # some branch types are still not being tested: >> @@ -88,10 +49,7 @@ test_filter() { >> >> echo "Testing branch stack filtering permutation ($filter,$expect)" >> >> - gen_test_program "$TEMPDIR/program.c" >> - cc -fno-inline -g "$TEMPDIR/program.c" -o $TMPDIR/a.out >> - >> - perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter $filter,save_type,u -- $TMPDIR/a.out > /dev/null 2>&1 >> + perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter $filter,save_type,u -- ${TESTPROG} > /dev/null 2>&1 >> perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstack | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script >> >> # fail if we find any branch type that doesn't match any of the expected ones