Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp5849039rwb; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:17:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4+1oM47N+MbSFb9IUw53CfcY+mrsl8H41A11HTeRRgOTDn4D18TGMQ9bbgNmSO/LjHMixe X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:cc8a:b0:7ae:f6e8:2502 with SMTP id up10-20020a170907cc8a00b007aef6e82502mr4989075ejc.157.1668449824636; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:17:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668449824; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UMCz5a+5R0l+I+kSqD3g5Tv49yv6wFFunOPW4/p3sIzYSXxaTtxgAlEsJd5ZGVGB7H lZ1mWHCUSXWbo8RO5kyX4sYW0apyEqbJAnAkxXZL6XlyHUXjcLgxtp0H9A1ZQuuHybHz DBwK7mFqRzAt+B1IlwI/X6hX0EvghbdjVj+xA/80QK4eWrWQ0COWLfMXFnQArHz+bUhy WEfyfLbtkUBfcoCgH0vuqW7Bk1yRHDP6UENuhNkW8uu7bHNHGPdSjCyBf9NhxrMxDz+E zpxtPoxq5so8D/Nh3B8E0J2TVqSbWNCVj3NRknTR7VI94YwPTvwmITzHhrahDea0zhhw Bnow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=gMfFNvsrdFXtawn8XRHQRW/OhAVAeacUEVexkBFje9I=; b=R4yQ5dWvCtkT2uyCI0QxhhZZ+Vv11f2KI9Is4GAByTrUMBUA2cYieJYmthN05TUGBH iemFVEE4Yx01hpuPnWFbytmbdvDvvuvt4kzoxD7gogcDIemLAgSY0I2eXsGhG+oc0wbv 3d5L+QT1xpbMKz8Zxk3U44gsVqt7VRKDY5NGy12vbVslpd4Q93uDHruVRSNtP4E7Aikp wryIc/lPpiH1oFhfB9e+QDJ7ADHXVHa7adYnqdAWTHkEtim4N2zAf0GfTnIBZy1Unqwa tpjgUkfmYZEYeuWmQSz5TdRZYQ90MQDTgmLrIPPOl2aGgG7x2C5DBt/aj+GxKBzXNMM9 xldA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=jiPBA+ce; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e2-20020a1709061e8200b0073d8f141e76si7640534ejj.130.2022.11.14.10.16.17; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:17:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=jiPBA+ce; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237964AbiKNR7U (ORCPT + 88 others); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:59:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237909AbiKNR7A (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:59:00 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A34C1705A for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:58:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2AEHBtXH021822; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=gMfFNvsrdFXtawn8XRHQRW/OhAVAeacUEVexkBFje9I=; b=jiPBA+ceXyEp9XpOqS3cs/IYunxpWYpRwrtZESHHNnbNLLVvp3jRsOuRgQRQaT5uTmRI uS6y15+EGjY9/DDNX+4huZHUzOTaw4PTD3W7kh7L4ynEkg0xhnOn7HBsFHUrTeucoJUr ytPxNzGyyuv7/yd2eAUbMXlaAKup4mfgy3LZz1KPpwez/nkbLT225mhqNBVfeInh2sau Fjsh73m1zH/CKQofM6TyyjgIHKvRHM5/PUu07M1ifnGNrgyW7ZIzVhmOLPf6dkEka2+g oNgogRteFbLlEaexbKEfmYWR3WMRgfoTricxX67ecJqRdH0OqCx8dwKMUn5hYRcsJpdR gQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kusuw16p3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:37 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2AEHF1N2029060; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:37 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kusuw16n5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:37 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2AEHoKS7018731; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:34 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3kt2rjayfh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:34 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2AEHwWvU197370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:32 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2351B11C04C; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DAA11C04A; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c3569c4c-1ef8-11b2-a85c-ee139cda3133.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.116.246]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Sathvika Vasireddy To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@redhat.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, rostedt@goodmis.org, mbenes@suse.cz, npiggin@gmail.com, chenzhongjin@huawei.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sv@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v6 01/16] powerpc: Fix __WARN_FLAGS() for use with Objtool Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 23:27:39 +0530 Message-Id: <20221114175754.1131267-2-sv@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20221114175754.1131267-1-sv@linux.ibm.com> References: <20221114175754.1131267-1-sv@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: noN8smxRfghHYFX4DXoX4jR3EseAXZ1W X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: u27N5ZS1TInePOwS6qHvNV8Ts0RsuM2k Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-11-14_13,2022-11-11_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=852 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2210170000 definitions=main-2211140125 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit 1e688dd2a3d675 ("powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto") updated __WARN_FLAGS() to use asm goto, and added a call to 'unreachable()' after the asm goto for optimal code generation. With CONFIG_OBJTOOL enabled, 'annotate_unreachable()' statement in 'unreachable()' tries to note down the location of the subsequent instruction in a separate elf section to aid code flow analysis. However, on powerpc, this results in gcc emitting a call to a symbol of size 0. This results in objtool complaining of "unannotated intra-function call" since the target symbol is not a valid function call destination. Objtool wants this annotation for code flow analysis, which we are not yet enabling on powerpc. As such, expand the call to 'unreachable()' in __WARN_FLAGS() without annotate_unreachable(): barrier_before_unreachable(); __builtin_unreachable(); This still results in optimal code generation for __WARN_FLAGS(), while getting rid of the objtool warning. We still need barrier_before_unreachable() to work around gcc bugs 82365 and 106751: - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365 - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751 Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Sathvika Vasireddy --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h index 61a4736355c2..ef42adb44aa3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ __label__ __label_warn_on; \ \ WARN_ENTRY("twi 31, 0, 0", BUGFLAG_WARNING | (flags), __label_warn_on); \ - unreachable(); \ + barrier_before_unreachable(); \ + __builtin_unreachable(); \ \ __label_warn_on: \ break; \ -- 2.31.1