Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9c883417-5a26-cc5d-a6c4-c00cba53f638@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:44:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/15] dt-bindings: mmc: mtk-sd: add bindings for
 MT8365 SoC
Content-Language: en-US
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Rosenkr=c3=a4nzer?= <bero@baylibre.com>,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com
References: <20221107211001.257393-1-bero@baylibre.com>
 <20221115025421.59847-1-bero@baylibre.com>
 <20221115025421.59847-8-bero@baylibre.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221115025421.59847-8-bero@baylibre.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 15/11/2022 03:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> From: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
> 
> Add MMC bindings for MT8365 bindings.


Drop second, redundant "bindings" from subject.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
> index 6f8ecb4788eb8..36f9fce8f4795 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ properties:
>                - mediatek,mt8192-mmc
>                - mediatek,mt8195-mmc
>            - const: mediatek,mt8183-mmc
> +      - items:
> +          - const: mediatek,mt8365-mmc
> +          - const: mediatek,mt8183-mmc

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Krzysztof