Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:40:24 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     guo.ziliang@zte.com.cn, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] KVM: replace DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE with
 DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE
Message-ID: <Y3PPCHa9Yzi1sSnQ@google.com>
References: <202211150858513761518@zte.com.cn>
 <Y3PM4euxrCFhZnCc@google.com>
 <b81f9af0-28a0-fe23-37df-64a785bfe52a@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b81f9af0-28a0-fe23-37df-64a785bfe52a@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/15/22 18:31, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, guo.ziliang@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > > From: guo ziliang <guo.ziliang@zte.com.cn>
> > > Fix the following coccicheck warning:
> > > /virt/kvm/kvm_main.c: 3849: 0-23: WARNING: vcpu_get_pid_fops
> > > should be defined with DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: guo ziliang <guo.ziliang@zte.com.cn>
> > > ---
> > > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > index 2719e10..6e58aec 100644
> > > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > @@ -3846,7 +3846,7 @@ static int vcpu_get_pid(void *data, u64 *val)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > 
> > > -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vcpu_get_pid_fops, vcpu_get_pid, NULL, "%llu\n");
> > > ++DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vcpu_get_pid_fops, vcpu_get_pid, NULL, "%llu\n");
> > 
> > NAK, third time is not a charm.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221101072506.7307-1-liubo03@inspur.com
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220815031228.64126-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn
> 
> Screw it, I'm going to send a pull request just to delete that file.

Heh, I was seriously considering sending a patch to do that too.