Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:40:02 +0100
From:   netdev@kapio-technology.com
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>, davem@davemloft.net,
        kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 0/2] mv88e6xxx: Add MAB offload support
In-Reply-To: <20221115161846.2st2kjxylfvlncib@skbuf>
References: <Y3NcOYvCkmcRufIn@shredder>
 <5559fa646aaad7551af9243831b48408@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221115102833.ahwnahrqstcs2eug@skbuf>
 <7c02d4f14e59a6e26431c086a9bb9643@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221115111034.z5bggxqhdf7kbw64@skbuf>
 <0cd30d4517d548f35042a535fd994831@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221115122237.jfa5aqv6hauqid6l@skbuf>
 <fb1707b55bd8629770e77969affaa2f9@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221115145650.gs7crhkidbq5ko6v@skbuf>
 <f229503b98d772c936f1fc8ca826a14f@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221115161846.2st2kjxylfvlncib@skbuf>
User-Agent: Gigahost Webmail
Message-ID: <e05f69915a2522fc1e9854194afcc87b@kapio-technology.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-11-15 17:18, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 05:03:01PM +0100, netdev@kapio-technology.com 
> wrote:
>> Yes, so you want me to simply increase the 50ms on line 58 in smi.c...
>> 
>> I have now tried to increase it even to 10000ms == 10s and it didn't 
>> help,
>> so something else must be needed...
> 
> Not only that, but also the one in mv88e6xxx_wait_mask().

So, I will not present you with a graph as it is a tedious process 
(probably
it is some descending gaussian curve wrt timeout occurring).

But 100ms fails, 125 I had 1 port fail, at 140, 150  and 180 I saw 
timeouts
resulting in fdb add fails, like (and occasional port fail):

mv88e6085 1002b000.ethernet-1:04: Timeout while waiting for switch
mv88e6085 1002b000.ethernet-1:04: port 0 failed to add be:7c:96:06:9f:09 
vid 1 to fdb: -110

At around 200 ms it looks like it is getting stable (like 5 runs, no 
problems).

So with the gaussian curve tail whipping ones behind (risque of failure) 
it
might need to be like 300 ms in my case... :-)