Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp7437626rwb; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:16:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6zxl2+pC0N33zaQCiVOv3CPT5KuFGnhZQpCYNo4aY+2Az40z5OijxfYUgxWm5CDtE4WUkL X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ebc3:b0:186:a22a:177e with SMTP id p3-20020a170902ebc300b00186a22a177emr5504802plg.163.1668543385527; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:16:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668543385; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fOkxCNxT1s3arQjtv/8ZQqgqbCLtO97MR87VZLOMRveOGBzn0DBIrFKNuYo0mYT7ie uwe6N/A5ycM2qrsjLjMqF2FEZoyIH1UKH0qpjqEeYKvApmzYeBHI648wAydx5dS1kYVh Stq6ZrD2xEj7aGc5aBz7hSxX50q+OQKs1eLENPgq+JDkMwkPEtxwI8yJ6hMoZl114ENA 4WHa5qVtJEI54zSdwKh4T+ozE7xEAgaYTCOy0jiwVBdeFNA/pV+fTch506s33M+0Ae5e Z5VGrkGAPR+LIHwHgthNpkiWltBjT1Zp+rZ9u7Fz4TR9SbCOUG3dCq0lfMCK3iPOvaMV i1AA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=m/idPlmlMSHYNd4VPV/uZ+42R303Fem83Y9Bl6HGhEk=; b=J2VcNL7QR5npnXZPsr8EWBppCLEuEVip3nCkmWBkxJgjBbolkz7NAvv4JiPEymoIdy cLn8eLsTZ7CtbPiTVocFGe+AzlwmgpWV6lQCrmIUsZIuRxFx68UAmUSKgmECvBucpEce 79qAhI+vS78dJ9wVOtG2M3G7XkUg6tGCPSv5IVw1Wj1ZQ3UuUDeAJjrk6NO2863eXsZL vnueHFnM7EIY+owyibaXc/y5K4SOaYKmDFpuWKyxL2MwMP612fNJz1Pu1UMud4+HLbNP eV2HqtxTPe7h1K5NjLQ+KlnI2RKt93ZDjdIxndYFUevTrPeGrU8hqVnXDvomLJeA0ZEh qSJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b="QB/jjPrQ"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n12-20020a17090a9f0c00b0021328e7e073si12231119pjp.165.2022.11.15.12.16.13; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b="QB/jjPrQ"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231327AbiKOTjI (ORCPT + 90 others); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:39:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40938 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230338AbiKOTiz (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:38:55 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9A1FD3B; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:38:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=m/idPlmlMSHYNd4VPV/uZ+42R303Fem83Y9Bl6HGhEk=; b=QB/jjPrQQAT8hA+XnNLKn5newW 3sIB6p85AcVqg9GDTQd5XWrkPSGYi7VE7q/AVPmk3oA5zsywMXiE2K9+PbdWTCSfcSsBQQ/rat+Zq 69IMgrgyQ1lr9mR6+2Z+yLZ0MOqLL9g8Eqx9nzn3mGUmjIPmdJyZvm/Ux4PM9ZDRSxvF9allMdE6h r48VCIodLTC3ZoFqCUFvx/x6AE/BaoBzheW3DGE4ScZYnDQ/Xgoa594c/Ns9X0PNh+xB56z/RtxdX kFFbMpPqHRpwE7hXwGN0JkqawQrlYLsjvzVEeAUouU8S6FJNz5HjDXNvDEiMY76cQne9+ZCPCzS5T 19aD/+KA==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ov1lT-00GYBj-0V; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:38:35 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F70300C6F; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 094CE2C36896F; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:32:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:32:31 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Rick Edgecombe Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H . J . Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V . Shankar" , Weijiang Yang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , John Allen , kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Yu-cheng Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 25/37] x86/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support Message-ID: References: <20221104223604.29615-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20221104223604.29615-26-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221104223604.29615-26-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:35:52PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > +static int shstk_setup(void) > +{ > + struct thread_shstk *shstk = ¤t->thread.shstk; > + unsigned long addr, size; > + > + /* Already enabled */ > + if (features_enabled(CET_SHSTK)) > + return 0; > + > + /* Also not supported for 32 bit and x32 */ > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_USER_SHSTK) || in_32bit_syscall()) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + size = adjust_shstk_size(0); > + addr = alloc_shstk(size); > + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) > + return PTR_ERR((void *)addr); > + > + fpregs_lock_and_load(); > + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, addr + size); > + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, CET_SHSTK_EN); This.. > + fpregs_unlock(); > + > + shstk->base = addr; > + shstk->size = size; > + features_set(CET_SHSTK); > + > + return 0; > +} > +static int shstk_disable(void) > +{ > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_USER_SHSTK)) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + /* Already disabled? */ > + if (!features_enabled(CET_SHSTK)) > + return 0; > + > + fpregs_lock_and_load(); > + /* Disable WRSS too when disabling shadow stack */ > + set_clr_bits_msrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, 0, CET_SHSTK_EN); And this... aren't very consistent in approach. Given there is no U_IBT yet, why complicate matters like this? > + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, 0); > + fpregs_unlock(); > + > + shstk_free(current); > + features_clr(CET_SHSTK); > + > + return 0; > +}