Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp26747rwb; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:29:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6LtZLrgwmP60+MzqAUiOB0siPgPbWNIdw2NBdx91wpYIC48kba+4J2nA7ljS7qDDvkjMgw X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fb92:b0:213:188c:158d with SMTP id cp18-20020a17090afb9200b00213188c158dmr1476539pjb.11.1668565757655; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:29:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668565757; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qArSXU+qiUR+9YnbuMBeYfzNCD/EF9wSqb7HokxnXRTHaX+N18XHe1UqNr9gc/X907 SIf0iIz1L5jS9/BCsHrXWpVJhty/SOnVwWxGGsP0iXTs7sCYnS8hQB+e6Hrkkt9KtkVb H9sWVKVJDhr3wAThR6qLEMAZ4UQRlzsyOXsGkdAGl0P98Zoo2AY4SuQ4iIT2tjgwe3w3 M0SoDZvcAp+PAchzROzi70PGBLV+XAasG4auYb5mR6FJiuS4dw9Oc84uMPIeZeo4ESHi li5Lk6ZmhQp9r+z8dTEkktoxJn/l/x0HyarLJjS/VAqUagmgupZDXBgU9zgwjJJE8XfJ Hs+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=ahZz9AJmzGlJIQIWPIPRIoLfIVWlXjpHEZJmoMH+xOc=; b=PU/mh/HmgyD+dPok82B4UZ85wQQohF3Wlkrfb4AnvRbEObvdQtytbiGpXmGd2levri PqvLzYC2qWJ10motnmAyKU3SgqFNeQ7U8Sz+jQjuwLrMidW1QpyHl0Fz4XVp8MtFc7lP kd/x12X7tc6loatdg7Oh45O2gB8mWm5ARdz9aNwdEjSEsMquJdDFM1eAkv1fU0RZJJHA Ryhsj9MhCSjrC2jmxobcxyVGlz3cM8k4Z3sHmP93VyZbCfOcKPN1kuhAeBEmVisaVWCK mfZHuNArmrChOCx3dl7aW3V193EPX+jj1ogvBcTZLnxyfgeahPD4eDvACFEyEdLp1OJD K8WQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@paul-moore-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gGDZf0rt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e13-20020a17090ab38d00b0020ae29877besi629395pjr.20.2022.11.15.18.29.03; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@paul-moore-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gGDZf0rt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231216AbiKPC1R (ORCPT + 90 others); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:27:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45716 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229643AbiKPC1P (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:27:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A5827B31 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id q1-20020a17090a750100b002139ec1e999so1032085pjk.1 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:27:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paul-moore-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ahZz9AJmzGlJIQIWPIPRIoLfIVWlXjpHEZJmoMH+xOc=; b=gGDZf0rtUePdblahow2E25VxQTPgN7jbIs+awl+TPpQNdPWanNp680Xf0nzQ7ZL+Ot pavAPVefaCJKXta+Y2M8VoiD75BMMdqL/nc6y3Yqu8UwQA1u6qmGuuFK0fY+nLsSH8Lv 4roikcbwV07w5YhUXsWDMXrCohpJH7hktpUdLVjXRv7d5HQGPloCu2jKkH/ynM3gk50w h8zf6xWphdiQfuoWFN4iMPRILF10kWYXSXI11LOTIWcFzwHeIcSv1L8dXgpqEKnCy0x6 7F+DA+dujgDJl1VAuzCRA5O4PpI8PiHDtP+PbEAhCa2VYjLRh7PxPQ5GU2Ty5bSEaJQ5 EriQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ahZz9AJmzGlJIQIWPIPRIoLfIVWlXjpHEZJmoMH+xOc=; b=UuKr88/deKPWZcdrlJJDVEy9W6bQHJ7apbwtftNUBGg0RPwMtXdn1W68bd4n4PZrql M1XGIQQAZ/dhoB3tvpvkOan/5qxzsAcTA6qecQBEa+2SkLaAgDx0TsDcIApeFjBE8hi/ apkG5ibItctO/Lr2NC9EIxlnsZTPihncpMkYCv0bnfX40QXK+TRTYhpkpLMEEzjG6gUM pWgcaXVAa478uDKhdCIBY7I0dhhLXF8A2mqbBnIkngVpXGIMLKS/mtYsu64Tg9eMMHYA Dl1qaHZuwIdmFMyOlbfvAa/d6QgNptT5vY9QWgtRIQXFSZAUYtsOYJQJqnAC31zxIV+7 LiHg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plsoq7z2FP22HJyB3ceEC4iM9bI4YB+qp85NBV89WP2k4ULJgqb aNAQaiuQ7WbDy773lKoA0g9n2ekv3AtCyEpXVtUL X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2b8c:b0:212:f4f1:96ee with SMTP id u12-20020a17090a2b8c00b00212f4f196eemr1447232pjd.72.1668565634126; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:27:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221115175652.3836811-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> <20221115175652.3836811-4-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> In-Reply-To: <20221115175652.3836811-4-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:27:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] lsm: Redefine LSM_HOOK() macro to add return value flags as argument To: Roberto Sassu Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, revest@chromium.org, jackmanb@chromium.org, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu , stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:58 PM Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu > > Define four return value flags (LSM_RET_NEG, LSM_RET_ZERO, LSM_RET_ONE, > LSM_RET_GT_ONE), one for each interval of interest (< 0, = 0, = 1, > 1). > > Redefine the LSM_HOOK() macro to add return value flags as argument, and > set the correct flags for each LSM hook. > > Implementors of new LSM hooks should do the same as well. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7.x > Fixes: 9d3fdea789c8 ("bpf: lsm: Provide attachment points for BPF LSM programs") > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu > --- > include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 2 +- > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 779 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 9 +- > kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 5 +- > security/bpf/hooks.c | 2 +- > security/security.c | 4 +- > 6 files changed, 466 insertions(+), 335 deletions(-) Just a quick note here that even if we wanted to do something like this, it is absolutely not -stable kernel material. No way. -- paul-moore.com