Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:11:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:11:41 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:1796 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:11:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20001118122404.A128@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 12:24:04 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: David Woodhouse , Alan Cox Cc: Jeff Garzik , torvalds@transmeta.com, dhinds@valinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) In-Reply-To: <12129.974384071@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <12129.974384071@redhat.com>; from David Woodhouse on Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 02:14:31PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said: > > Umm.. Linus drivers dont appear to be SMP safe on unload > > AFAIK, no kernel threads are currently SMP safe on unload. However, > the PCMCIA thread would be safe with the patch below, and we could fairly > easily convert the others to use up_and_exit() once it's available. > > Anyone using PCMCIA or CardBus with 2.4, even if you have a non-CardBus > i82365 or TCIC controller for which the driver was disabled in test11-pre5, > please could you test this? Especially if you have TCIC, in fact, because > it's already been tested successfully on yenta and i82365. Thanx a lot, it fixed problems with my i82365. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/