Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:49:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:49:54 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:13192 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:49:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:48:42 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Larry McVoy cc: Alan Cox , Daniel Phillips , "David S. Miller" , davidel@xmailserver.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com, riel@conectiva.com.br, lars.spam@nocrew.org, hps@intermeta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SMP/cc Cluster description In-Reply-To: <20011206143218.O27589@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > I'm not sure what the point is. We've already agreed that the multiple OS > instances will have synchonization to do for file operations, ftruncate > being one of them. That's nice. But said operation involves serious wanking with metadata and _that_ would better have exclusion with write(2) and some warranties about pageouts. You can do lockless get_block() and truncate(). And it will be a hive of races always ready to break out. We used to try that and it was a fscking mess of unbelievable proportions - worse than that in full-blown rename() support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/