Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:09:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:09:38 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:32908 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:09:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 15:08:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20011206.150847.45874365.davem@redhat.com> To: bcrl@redhat.com Cc: lm@bitmover.com, phillips@bonn-fries.net, davidel@xmailserver.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com, riel@conectiva.com.br, lars.spam@nocrew.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, hps@intermeta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SMP/cc Cluster description From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20011206172708.B31752@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20011206122116.H27589@work.bitmover.com> <20011206.130202.107681970.davem@redhat.com> <20011206172708.B31752@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Benjamin LaHaise Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:27:08 -0500 - lower overhead for SMP systems. We can use UP kernels local to each CPU. Should make kernel compiles faster. ;-) Actually, this isn't what is being proposed. Something like "4 cpu" SMP kernels. At the very least it is well worth investigating. Bootstrapping the ccCluster work shouldn't take more than a week or so, which will let us attach some hard numbers to the kind of impact it has on purely cpu local tasks. I think it is worth considering too, but I don't know if a week estimate is sane or not :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/